Direct Trade in the Specialty Coffee Market: Contributions, Limitations and New Lines of Research

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18568/internext.v15i3.588

Palavras-chave:

Relationship Coffees, Fair Trade, Sustainability, Strategy, Specialty Coffee

Resumo

Study aim: we aimed to outline the direct trade of specialty coffees’ global research and adoption, highlighting its contributions, limitations and theoretical and empirical gaps, providing insights for future studies.

Method: integrative systematic review of selected academic materials from the Web of Knowledge, SciELO, Scopus, Science Direct and Scholar Google databases, as well as technical materials from the Specialty Coffee Association and the Perfect Daily Grind portals, which were analyzed using the qualitative and open grid categorical content analysis technique.

Main results: we identified three categories of contributions associated with Direct Trade - "Relationship and Coordination", "Origin and Sustainability" and "Quality and Differentiation" and three categories of its limitations - "Conceptual and Regulatory", "Execution and Monitoring" and "Potential of Transformation and Accessibility". Despite its potential to contribute to the promotion of the sustainability of this market, Direct Trade is not the only solution to the many and complex challenges of the activity. Therefore, it should be adapted to local realities and be carefully adopted, preferably in conjunction with other initiatives aimed at opening different markets and reaching different consumer audiences.

Relevance/originality: this is the first systematic review of the subject, required by the rapid growth of studies in the field, despite its currentness and only recent expansion of the debate.

Theoretical/methodological contributions: we presented a new concept of Direct Trade, subdivided the practice into two perspectives - relational and transactional – and elaborated a framework for its realization.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Elisa Reis Guimarães, Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA)

Professora Adjunta do Departamento de Administração e Economia (DAE) da Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA)

Paulo Henrique Montagnana Vicente Leme, Departamento de Administração e Economia (DAE) da Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA)

Doutor em Administração pela Universidade Federal de Lavras - UFLA, Minas Gerais, (Brasil). Diretor do Núcleo de Inovação Tecnológica/Vice-Reitoria (NINTEC/UFLA). Professor Adjunto no Departamento de Administração e Economia da Universidade Federal de Lavras. Professor no Programa de Pós-Graduação em Administração (PPGA/UFLA).

Angélica da Silva Azevedo, Doutoranda do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Administração (PPGA) da Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA)

Doutoranda em Administração pela Universidade Federal de Lavras - UFLA, Minas Gerais, (Brasil). 

Referências

Adams, R.J., Jeanrenaud, S., Bessant, J., Overy, P., & Denyer, D. (2012). Sustainability oriented innovation: a systematic review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 18(2), pp. 180-205.

Adams, R. J., Smart, P., & Huff, A. S. (2017). Shades of Grey: Guidelines for Working with the Grey Literature in Systematic Reviews for Management and Organizational Studies.

International Journal of Management Reviews, 19, 432–454.

Akiyama, T. & Varangis, P. N. (1990). The impact of the international coffee agreement on producing countries. The World Bank Economic Review, 4(2), 157-173.

Auld, G. (2010). Assessing certification as governance: effects and broader consequences for coffee. The Journal of Environment & Development, 19(2), 215-241.

Bacon, C. M., Méndez, V. E., Gómez, M. E. F., Stuart, D., & Flores, S. R. D. (2008). Are sustainable coffee certifications enough to secure farmer livelihoods? The millennium development goals and Nicaragua’s Fair Trade cooperatives. Globalizations, 5(2), 259-274.

Badiyan-Eyford, J. (2013). Direct trade coffee: prospects and pitfalls. Dissertation (Master of Arts) - University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

Barham, B. L., & Weber, J. G. (2012). The economic sustainability of certified coffee: Recent evidence from Mexico and Peru. World Development, 40(6), 1269-1279.

Bastos, M. H. R., de Oliveira, U. R., Souza, T. C. R., dos Santos, R. F., & do Lago, M. M. (2019). Análise de discurso e Análise de Conteúdo: Um levantamento de suas aplicações nas ciências aplicadas membros da Administração. Brazilian Journal of Development, 5(11), pp. 26301-26322.

Boaventura, P. S. M., Abdalla, C. C., Araújo, C. L., & Arakelian, J. S. (2018). Value Co-Creation in the Specialty Coffee Value Chain: The Third-Wave Coffee Movement. Revista de Administração de Empresas, 3(58), 254–266.

Bode, R., & Piechaczek, J. (2007). Innovations towards product differentiation - farmers associations’ strategies to integrate into specialty coffee value chains. In: Anais Conference on International Agricultural Research for Development, Göttingen.

Borrella, I., Mataix, C., & Carrasco‐Gallego, R. (2015). Smallholder farmers in the speciality coffee industry: opportunities, constraints and the businesses that are making it possible. IDS Bulletin, 46(3), 29-44.

Botelho, L. L. R., Cunha, C. C. de A., & Macedo, M. (2011). O método da revisão integrativa nos estudos organizacionais. Gestão e Sociedade, 5(11), 121-136.

Bro, A., & Clay, D. C. (2017). Transforming Burundi’s coffee sector through strategic value chain investments. Journal of Agribusiness in Developing and Emerging Economies, 7(3), 218-230.

Cavalcante, R. B., Calixto, P., & Pinheiro, M. M. K. (2014). Análise de conteúdo: considerações gerais, relações com a pergunta de pesquisa, possibilidades e limitações do método. Informação & Sociedade, 24(1), pp. 13-18.

Caregnato, R. C. A., & Mutti, R. (2006). Pesquisa qualitativa: análise de discurso versus análise de conteúdo. Texto & Contexto - Enfermagem, 15(4), 679-84.

Carvalho, J. P. (2016). Campo organizacional e adoção de Indicação Geográfica (IG): um estudo sobre a produção de cafés especiais no Brasil. Tese (Doutorado em Administração de Organizações) - Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brasil.

Clarke, N., Barnett, C., Cloke, P., & Malpass, A. (2007). The political rationalities of fair-trade consumption in the United Kingdom. Politics & Society, 35(4), 583-607.

Cluley, R. (2018). The construction of marketing measures: The case of viewability. Marketing Theory, 18(3), pp. 287-305.

Campos, C. J. G. (2004). Método de análise de conteúdo: ferramenta para a análise de dados qualitativos no campo da saúde. Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem, 57(5), 611-614.

Cole, N. L. (2014). Ethical Consumption in the Global Age: Coffee’s Promise of a Better World. In: N. Mathur. Consumer Culture, Modernity, and Identity (pp. 318-344). New Delhi: Sage Publications.

Daviron, B., & Ponte, S. (2013). The coffee paradox: global markets, commodity trade and the elusive promise of development. London: Zed Books.

Dorval, M., Jobin, M., & Benomar, N. (2019). Lean culture: a comprehensive systematic literature review. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 68(5), pp. 920-937.

Edelmann, H., Quiñones-Ruiz, X. F., & Penker, M. (2020). Analytic framework to determine proximity in relationship coffee models. Sociologia Ruralis, 60(2), 458-481.

Esmaeili, L., & Hashemi G., S. A. (2019). A systematic review on social commerce. Journal of Strategic Management, 27(4), pp. 317-355.

Fischer, E. F. (2017). Quality and inequality: taste, value, and power in the third wave coffee Market. MPIfG Discussion Paper, 17(4), 1-36.

Folmer, B., Blank, I., Farah, A., Giuliano, P., Sanders, D., & Wille, C. Introduction. In:

Folmer, B. (Ed.). The craft and science of coffee. London: Academic Press.

Foster, D. L. (2011). From crop to cup: the plight of coffee. Dissertation (Master of Sciences) - University of Montana, Missoula, USA.

Gerard, A.; Lopez, M. C. & McCright, A. M. (2019). Coffee Roasters’ Sustainable Sourcing Decisions and Use of the Direct Trade Label. Sustainability, 11(19), 5437.

Gheibi, S., Kazaz, B., & Webster, S. (2017).Direct trade and the third-wave coffee: sourcing and pricing a specialty product under uncertainty. Syracuse: Syracuse University.

Gilbert, C. L. (1996). International commodity agreements: an obituary notice. World Development, 24(1), l-19.

Guimarães, E. R., Castro Júnior, L. G., & Andrade, H. C. C. (2016). A Terceira Onda do Café em Minas Gerais. Organizações Rurais & Agroindustriais, 18(3), pp. 214-227.

Gyllensten, B. (2017). Micro mills, specialty coffee and relationships: following the supply chain from Costa Rica to Norway. Dissertation (Master of Culture, Environment and Sustainability) - University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.

Hernandez-Aguilera, J. N., Gómez, M. I., Rodewald, A. D., Rueda, X., Anunu, C., Bennett, R., & Es, H. M. (2018). Quality as a driver of sustainable agricultural value chains: the case of the relationship coffee model. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(2), 179-198.

Holland, E., Kjeldsen, C., & Kerndrup, S. (2015). Coordinating quality practices in Direct Trade coffee. Journal of Cultural Economy, 9(2), 1-11.

Holmberg, S. R. (2011).Solving the “coffee paradox”: understanding Ethiopia’s coffee cooperatives through Elinor Ostrom’s theory of the commons. Thesis (Doctorate in Philosophy) - University of Massachusetts, Amherst, USA.

Hotvedt, M. E. (2012). Buy global, think local: direct trade coffee and community renaissance in Olympia, Washington. Thesis (Doctorate in History) - Claremont McKenna College, Claremont, USA.

Kallio, H., Pietilä, A. M., Johnson, M., & Kangasniemi, M. (2016). Systematic methodological review: developing a framework for a qualitative semi‐structured interview guide. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 72(12), 2954-2965.

Kolk, A., & Lenfant, F. (2016). Hybrid business models for peace and reconciliation. Business Horizons, 59(5), 503-524.

Latta, P. (2014). Direct trade: the new fair trade. Global Societies Journal, 2(1), 1-18.

Lannigan, J. (2020). Making a space for taste: Context and discourse in the specialty coffee scene. International Journal of Information Management, 51, 101987.

Lautz, B. A. (2011). Fair trade and development goals in the coffee sector. Dissertation (Master of International Studies) - DePaul University, Chicago, USA.

Leeson, M. (2013). Burundi in the World of Direct Trade and specialty coffee. Dissertation (Master in Philosophy) - University of Oslo, Norway.

Liu, Y. (2016). Configuring the qualification of good coffee: an ethnography on the specialty coffee industry in Milwaukee. Dissertation (Master of Sciences) - University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, USA.

Lukas, K. D. (2015). The supply chain of fair trade coffee: challenges, opportunities & the future inside a troubled industry. Dissertation (Master of Sciences) - University of Vermont, Burlington, USA.

Macgregor, F., Ramasar, V., & Nicholas, K. A. (2017). Problems with firm-led voluntary sustainability schemes: the case of direct trade coffee. Sustainability, 9(4),2017.

Nandonde, F. A., & Kuada, J. (2016). International firms in Africa’s food retail business-emerging issues and research agenda. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 44(4), pp. 448-464.

Olsen, A. (2012). H. Analysing the Direct Trade Model: a study of a promising market based trend in ethical coffee sourcing. Dissertation (Master in Business Studies and Development) -Copenhagen Business School, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Panhuysen, S., & Pierrot, J. (2018). Coffee Barometer 2018. The Hague: Hivos.

Parker, S. F. (2011). How good the coffee can be. An interview with Stumptown’s Matt Lounsbury. In: Parker, S. F. & Austin, M. W. (Ed.). Coffee: philosophy for everyone. (pp. 166-173). West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.

Perez, J., Kilian, B., Pratt, L., Ardila, J. C., Lamb, H., Byers, L., & Sanders, D. (2017). Economic sustainability - price, cost and value. In: Folmer, B. (Ed.) The craft and science of coffee. (pp. 133-158). London: Academic Press.

Pulido, M. (2017). Formulating a strategy for an e-commerce of specialty coffee - case: startup company the Netherlands. Dissertation (Master of International Business Management) -Haaga-Helia University of Applied Sciences, Malmi, Finland.

Robbins, T. (2015).The specialty question: economic empowerment in the Colombian Coffee lands. Dissertation (Master of Arts) - Wesleyan University, Middletown, USA.

Rosenberg, L., Swilling, M., & Vermeulen, W. J. V. (2018). Practices of third wave coffee: a burundian producer’s perspective. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(2), 199-214.

Samper, L. F., Giovannucci, D., & Vieira, L. M. (2017). The powerful role of intangibles in the coffee value chain. Geneva: World Intellectual Property Organization.

Samper, L. F., & Quiñones-Ruiz, X. F. (2017). Towards a balanced sustainability vision for the coffee industry. Resources, 6(2), 1-28.

Schroeder, S. (2015). When ethics are good for business: a case study on the strategic importance of direct trade for three speciality coffee roasters in Copenhagen. Dissertation (Master of Business, Language and Culture) - Copenhagen Business School, Denmark.

Strand, E. (2014).Understanding differentiated coffee: a value chain perspective. Dissertation (Master of International Business and Marketing) - University of Nordland, Bodø, Norway.

Sunderland, S. (2012). Trading the happy object: coffee, colonialism, and friendly feeling. M/C Journal, 15(2), 1-3.

Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14, pp. 207–222.

Vicol, M., Neilson, J., Hartatri, D. F. S., & Cooper, P. (2018). Upgrading for whom? Relationship coffee, value chain interventions and rural development in Indonesia. World Development, 110, 26–37.

Watts, G. (2013). Direct Trade in coffee. In: Thurston, R. W., Morris, J., & Steiman, S. (Ed.).Coffee: a comprehensive guide to the bean, the beverage, and the industry. (pp. 138-144). Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield.

Downloads

Publicado

2020-07-02

Como Citar

Guimarães, E. R., dos Santos, A. C., Leme, P. H. M. V., & Azevedo, A. da S. (2020). Direct Trade in the Specialty Coffee Market: Contributions, Limitations and New Lines of Research. Internext, 15(3), 34–62. https://doi.org/10.18568/internext.v15i3.588