Dynamic Capabilities and Innovation Internationalization: The Case Siemens Brazil

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18568/internext.v14i1.463

Keywords:

Internacionalização, Capacidades Dinâmicas, Subsidiária, Multinacional

Abstract

The overall objective was to analyze how the process of developing dynamic capabilities can be enhanced by the practices of internationalization of innovation include, in particular: (a) autonomy in R & D granted to the subsidiary of a multinational, (b) the delegated technological assignments the subsidiary of a multinational, (c) reverse transfer subsidiary of knowledge assets to the array and other foreign subsidiaries of a multinational and (d) the ambidesteridade (adaptation and alignment functions) exerted by the subsidiary of a multinational. To this end, it carried out a qualitative research and adopted as a method to study the case of Siemens Brazil. Specifically, analyzed in depth the mechanisms and development interfaces of the following innovations of Siemens Brazil: (1) Underground Transformer Dry DrySub, (2) System Smart Grid power management, (3) Dynamic Positioning System Offshore platforms and (4) Contactors Digital. The survey findings reveal relevant scientific contributions with regard to understanding the fundamentals and key processes of the dynamic of technological development site of a subsidiary, and synergies towards the internationalization practices of innovation of a multinational.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Antonio de Sant'Anna Limongi França, Faculdade de Engenharia de Produção da Escola Politécnica da Universidade de São Paulo - USP.

Pós doutorando na Faculdade de Engenharia de Produção da Escola Politécnica da Universidade de São Paulo - USP, São Paulo, (Brasil). Doutor em Administração pela Universidade Nove de Julho - UNINOVE, São Paulo. Diretor Executivo da empresa LF1 Inovação Tecnológica e Estratégias Organizacionais.

Emerson Antonio Maccari, Programa de Mestrado e Doutorado em Administração da Universidade Nove de Julho - UNINOVE.

Doutor em Administração pela Unoversidade de São Paulo - USP, São Paulo, (Brasil). Professor na Universidade Nove de Julho - UNINOVE, São Paulo. 

Priscila Rezende Da Costa, Programa de Mestrado e Doutorado em Administração da Universidade Nove de Julho - UNINOVE.

Doutora em Administração pela Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidade da Universidade de São Paulo - FEA/USP, São Paulo, (Brasil). Diretora do Programa de Pós-graduação em Administração da Universidade Nove de Julho, UNINOVE. É professora dos cursos de Mestrado e Doutorado em Administração, Linha de Inovação, l

References

Altmann, R. M. (2005). As Multinacionais Brasileiras com Plantas Industriais no Exterior: Configuração das Operações Internacionais. Dissertação de mestrado, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia de Produção, Escola Politécnica da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brasil.

Ambos, B., & Schlegelmilch, B. B. (2007). Innovation and control in the multinational firm: a comparison of political and contingency approaches. Strategic Management Journal, 28, 473–486.

Andersson, U., Forsgren, M., & Holm, U. (2002). The strategic impact of external networks: subsidiary performance and competence development in the multinational corporation. Strategic Management Journal, 23, 979-996.

Bailyn, L. (1985). Autonomy in the industrial R-and-D Lab. Human Resource Management, 24 (2), 129–146.

Bartlett, C. A., & Ghoshal, S. (1989). Managing Across Borders: The Transnational Solution. Harvard Business School Press, Boston.

Birkinshaw, J., & Gibson, C. (2004). Building Ambidexterity into an Organization. MIT Sloan Management Review, 45 (4), 47-55.

Birkinshaw, J., Hood, N., & Young, S. (2005). Subsidiary entrepreneurship, internal and external competitive forces, and subsidiary performance. International Business Review, 14 (2), 227–248.

Birkinshaw, J. (1996). How multinational subsidiary are gained or lost. Journal of International Business Studie, 27 (3), 496-495.

Bouquet, C., & Birkinshaw, J. (2008). Weight versus voice: How foreign subsidiaries gain attention from corporate headquarters. Academy of Management Journal, 51 (1).

Cantwell, J., Dunning, J. H., & Lundan, S. M. (2010). An evolutionary approach to understanding international business activity: The co-evolution of MNEs and the institutional environment. Journal of International Business Studies, 41 (4) 567-586.

Cantwell, J., & Piscitello, L. (2007). Attraction and deterrence in the location of foreign-owned R&D activities: the role of positive and negative spillovers. International Journal of Technological Learning, Innovation and Development, 1 (1), 83–111.

Cantwell, J., & Mudambi, R. (2005). MNE competence-creating subsidiary mandates. Strategic Management Journal, 26 , p. 1109–1128.

Collis, D., & Montgomery, C. (1995). Competing on resources strategy in the 1990s. Harvard Business Review, p. 118-128.

Criscuolo, P., & Narula, R. (2007). Using multi-hub structures for international R&D: organizational inertia and the challenge of implementation. Management International Review, 47 ( ), 1–22.

Doz, Y., Santos, J., & Williamson, P. (2001). From Global to Metanational. Harvard Business School Press, Boston.

Dunning, J. H. (2006). Towards a paradigm of development: implications for the determinants of international business activity. Transnational Corporations, 15 (1), 173–227.

Dunning, J. H., & Lundan, S. M. (2010). The institutional origins of dynamic capabilities in multinational enterprises. Industrial and Corporate Change, 19 (4), 1225-1246.

Dunning, J. H., & Lundan, S. M. (2008). Multinational Enterprises and the Global Economy. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, United Kingdom.

Eden, L. (2009). Letter from editor-in-chief: reverse knowledge transfers, culture clashes and going international. Journal of International Business Studies, 40 (2), 177–180.

Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: what are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21, 1105–1121.

Flick, U. (2009). Uma introdução à pesquisa qualitativa: Bookman.

Frost, T., Birkinshaw, J., & ENSIGN, P. (2002). Centers of Excellence in Multinational Corporations. Strategic Management Journal, 23, 997-1018.

Frost, T.S., & Zhou, C. (2005) R&D co-practice and ‘reverse’ knowledge integration in multinational firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 36 (6), 676–687.

GIL, A. C. (2002). Métodos e técnicas de pesquisa social: Atlas.

Gnyawali, D., Singal, M., & Mu, S. (2009). Knowledge ties among subsidiaries in MNCs: a multi-level conceptual model. Journal of International Management, 15 (4), p. 387–400.

Helfat, C. E., Finkelstein, S., Mitchell, W., Peteraf, M., Singh, H., Teece, D., & Winter, S. G. (2007). Dynamic Capabilities: Understanding Strategic Change. In. Organizations. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

Keupp, M, M., Palmié, M., & Gassmann, O. (2011). Achieving Subsidiary Integration in International Innovation by Managerial “Tools”. Management International Review, 51 (2), 213-239.

Lehrer, M., Asakawa, K., & Behnam, M. (2011). Home base-compensating R&D: Indicators, public policy, and ramifications for multinational firms. Journal of International Management, 17 (1), 42-53.

Manolopoulos, D., Söderquist, K. E., & Pearce, R. (2011). Coordinating decentralized research and development laboratories: A survey analysis. Journal of International Management, 17 (2), 114-129.

Marin, A., & Bell, M. (2010). The local / global integration of MNC subsidiaries and their technological behaviour: Argentina in the late 1990s. Research Policy, 39 (7), 919-931.

Martins, G. de A. (2006). Estudo de caso: Uma estratégia de pesquisa: Editora Atlas.

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1984). Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

Monteiro, L. F., Arvidsson, N., & Birkinshaw, J. (2008). Knowledge flows within multinational corporations: Explaining subsidiary isolation and its performance implications. Organization Science, 19 (1), 90–107.

Mudambi, R. (2008). Location, control and innovation in knowledge intensive industries. Journal of Economic Geography, 8 (5), 669–725.

Mudambi, R., & Navarra, P. (2004). Is knowledge power? Knowledge flows, subsidiary power and rent-seeking within MNCs. Journal of International Business Studies, 35, 385–406.

Nobel, R., & Birkinshaw, J. (1998). Patterns of control and communication in international research and development units. Strategic Management Journal, 19, 479–498.

Noorderhaven, N., & Harzing, A. W. (2009). Knowledge-sharing and social interaction within MNEs. Journal of International Business Studies, 40 (5), 719–741.

Penrose, E. (1959). The theory of the growth of the firm. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Peteraf, M. A. (1993). The cornerstones of competitive advantage: a resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal, 14 (3), 179-191.

Phene, A., & Almeida, P. (2008). Innovation in multinational subsidiaries: the role of knowledge assimilation and subsidiary capabilities. Journal of International Business Studies, 39 (5), 901–919.

Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The Core Competence of the Corporation. Harvard Business Review, p. 79-91.

Rabbiosi, L. (2011). Subsidiary roles and reverse knowledge transfer: An investigation of the effects of coordination mechanisms. Journal of International Management, 17 (2), 97-113.

Richardson, R. J. (1999). Pesquisa Social: Métodos e Técnicas: Atlas.

Siemens. (2014). Relatório anual e de Sustentabilidade. Disponível em: < http://relatorioanual2014.com.br/downloads/siemens-relatorio-anual-2014.pdf >. Acesso em Outubro de 2015.

Sirkin, H. L., Hemerling, J. W., & Bhattacharya, A. K. (2008). Globality: challenger companies are radically redefining the competitive landscape. Strategy & Leadership, 36 (6), p. 36–41.

Teece, D. J. (2014). A dynamic capabilities-based entrepreneurial theory of the multinational enterprise, Journal of International Business Studies, 45 (1), 8–37.

Teece, D. J. (1980). Economics of scope and the scope of the enterprise. Journal Economic Behavior and Organization, 1 (3), 223-247.

Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28, 319–1350.

Teece, D. J. (1986). Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy, 15 (6) 285-305.

Teece, D. J. (1982). Towards an economic theory of the multiproduct firm. Journal Economic Behavior Organization, 3 (1), 39-63.

Teece, D. J., PISANO, G., & SHUEN, A. (1997). Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management. Strategic Management Journal, 18 ( ), 509-533.

Vieira, M. M. F. (2004). Por uma Boa Pesquisa (Qualitativa) em Administração. In M. M. F. Vieira & D. M. Zouain (Eds.), Pesquisa qualitativa em administração: FGV Editora.

Winter, S. G. (2003). Understanding Dynamic Capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 24 ( ), 991-995.

Yang, Q., Mudambi, R., & Meyer, K. (2008). Conventional and reverse knowledge flows in multinational corporations. Journal of Management, 34 (5), 882–902.

Yiu, D. W., Lau, C. M., & Bruton, G. D. (2007). International venturing by emerging economy firms: The effects of firm capabilities, home country networks, and corporate entrepreneurship. Journal of International Business Studies, 38 (4), 519–540.

Published

2019-01-02

How to Cite

Limongi França, A. de S., Maccari, E. A., & Costa, P. R. D. (2019). Dynamic Capabilities and Innovation Internationalization: The Case Siemens Brazil. Internext - International Business and Management Review, 14(1), 76–92. https://doi.org/10.18568/internext.v14i1.463

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.