Métodos de sistematização de literatura em estudos científicos: bibliometria, meta-análise e revisão sistemática
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18568/internext.v17i2.704Keywords:
Sistematização de literatura, Bibliometria, Meta-análise, Revisão sistemáticaAbstract
Este artigo tem por objetivo apresentar os métodos mais populares para a realização de sistematizações de literatura, são eles: a bibliometria e a meta-análise de natureza quantitativa e a revisão sistemática, cujo viés é qualitativo. Diferente de uma pesquisa bibliográfica tradicional, o uso de métodos de sistematização de literatura traz maior rigor e transparência aos estudos científicos. Neste sentido, apresentamos uma síntese sobre qual método escolher, premissas principais, critérios de qualidade e referencias chave para a realização desse tipo de pesquisa. Esperamos que esta síntese sirva como um guia básico para os acadêmicos que buscam desenvolver artigos usando métodos de sistematização de literatura.
Downloads
References
Aguinis, H., Pierce, C. A., Bosco, F. A., Dalton, D. R., & Dalton, C. M. (2011). Debunking myths and urban legends about meta-analysis. Organizational Research Methods, 14 (2), 306–331.
Aguinis, H., Gottfredson, R. K., & Wright, T. A. (2011). Best-practice recommendations for estimating interaction effects using meta-analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32(8), 1033–1043.
Bernerth JB, Aguinis H (2016) A critical review and best-practice recommendations for control variable usage. Pers Psychol 69(1):229–283
Bergh DD, Aguinis H, Heavey C, Ketchen DJ, Boyd BK, Su P, Lau CLL, Joo H (2016) Using metanalytic structural equation modeling to advance strategic management research: Guidelines and an empirical illustration via the strategic leadership-performance Relationship. Strateg Manag Journal, 37(3):477–497.
Borenstein M (2009) Effect sizes for continuous data. In: Cooper H, Hedges LV, Valentine JC (eds) The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis. Russell Sage Foundation, pp 221–235
Combs, J. G., Ketchen, D. J., Jr, Crook, T. R., & Roth, P. L. (2011). Assessing cumulative evidence within ‘macro’research: Why meta-analysis should be preferred over vote counting. Journal of Management Studies, 48(1), 178–197.
DeSimone JA, Brannick MT, O’Boyle EH, Ryu JW (2020) Recommendations for reviewing meta-analyses in organizational research. Organ Res Methods 56:455–463
Fisch C, Block J (2018) Six tips for your (systematic) literature review in business and Management research. Manag Rev Quart 68:103–106.
Geyskens I, Krishnan R, Steenkamp JBE, Cunha PV (2009) A review and evaluation of meta-analysis practices in management research. J Manag 35(2):393–419.
Gusenbauer M, Haddaway NR (2020) Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta-analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources. Res Synth Methods 11(2):181–217
Hansen, C., Steinmetz, H., & Block, J. (2021). How to conduct a meta-analysis in eight steps: a practical guide. Management Review Quarterly, 1-19.
Harari MB, Parola HR, Hartwell CJ, Riegelman A (2020) Literature searches in systematic reviews and meta-analyses: A review, evaluation, and recommendations. J Vocat Behav 118:103377.
Hoon C (2013) Meta-synthesis of qualitative case studies: an approach to theory building. Organ Res Methods 16(4):522–556.
Okubo, Y. “Bibliometric Indicators and Analysis of Research Systems: Methods and Examples”, OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, 1997/01, OECD Publishing.Systems, 1997. Acesso em: 18/03/2014. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/208277770603
López-López JA, Page MJ, Lipsey MW, Higgins JP (2018) Dealing with effect size multiplicity in systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Res Synth Methods 9(3):336–351.
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339.
Steel P, Beugelsdijk S, Aguinis H (2021) The anatomy of an award-winning meta-analysis: Recommendations for authors, reviewers, and readers of meta-analytic reviews. Journal of International Bussiness Studies, 52(1):23–44-
Thompson SG, Higgins JP (2002) How should meta-regression analyses be undertaken and interpreted? Stat Med 21(11):1559–1573.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Gabriel Vouga Chueke, Marcos Amatucci
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
- The author(s) authorize the publication of the article in the journal;
- The author(s) ensure that the contribution is original and unpublished and is not being evaluated in other journal(s);
- The journal is not responsible for the opinions, ideas and concepts expressed in the texts because they are the sole responsibility of the author(s);
- In case an article will be approved for publication, the author will sign the term of Cession of Copyright to the journal, according to the download form.
