Creation of Local Innovation by Foreign Subsidiaries from Specific Advantages of the Subnational Environment

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18568/internext.v16i1.600

Keywords:

Foreign subsidiaries, Subnational environment, Local innovation, Multiple linear regression

Abstract

Purpose - The study examines the effects of the (Brazilian) subnational competitive environment and relational embeddedness on the foreign subsidiary local innovation.

Method – Primary data are collected through a survey from 152 foreign subsidiaries located in thirteen states in Brazil. Secondary data are sourced from the World Bank Enterprise Surveys. The data are analyzed through multiple regression.

Main results - The results show a positive significant association between the subnational competitive environment and the local innovation of subsidiaries. However, there is no association between subnational external embeddedness and subsidiary local innovation. Furthermore, companies that enter through acquisitions are strongly associated with local innovation.

Relevance/Originality - The study adds to the existing exchanges on the effect of subnational environment on the subsidiary local innovation, taking Brazil as an empirical context. A subnational level analysis is important as it considers subnational institutional heterogeneity and reveals variations that could be disregarded where a national level analysis is undertaken.

Theoretical/methodological contributions: Although there is evidence of the impact of the institutional environment on strategy and innovation, this study makes some contributions. First, while existing studies do focus on both the developed as well as emerging markets, the focus with regard to the latter is mainly on Asia, and other important contexts such as Latin American having specific idiosyncrasies are ignored. Second, the study contributes to the studies of Economic Geography, supporting that each subnational environment has its particularities, as demonstrated in the nature of subnational issues in Brazil.

Social / management contributions: In managerial terms, the study draws attention to the importance of knowledge of the subnational competitive dynamics regarding the participation of the informal economy and extends implications for public policies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Cristina Doritta Rodrigues, Escola Superior de Propaganda e Marketing - ESPM

Doutoranda no Programa de Pós Graduação em Administração pela Escola Superior de Propaganda e Marketing  - PPGA/ESPM, (Bolsista CAPES Integral).

 

 

Felipe Mendes Borini, Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidade da Universidade de São Paulo -FEA/USP.

Professor da Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidade da Universidade de São Paulo -FEA/USP, São Paulo, (Brasil). Professor do MPGN da FIA. Doutor em Administração pela Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidade da Universidade de São Paulo - FEA/USP. 

Muhammad Mustafa Raziq, National University of Sciences and Technology, H-12, Islamabad, Pakistan.

Professor Associado na NUST Business School, Universidade Nacional de Ciências e Tecnologia - NUST, Islamabad, (Paquistão). PhD em gestão estratégica pela Massey University, Nova Zelândia.

Manuel Portugal Ferreira, Departamento de Administração e Economia, Universidade Federal de Lavras - UFLA. Escola Superior de Tecnologia e Gestão, Polytechnic Institute of Leiria, Portugal.

Doutor em Administração pela Universidade de Utah com pós-doutorado pela Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidade da Universidade de São Paulo - FEA/USP, São Paulo, (Brasil). Professor no Departamento de Administração e Economia, Universidade Federal de Lavras - UFLA, Campus Universitário, Minas Gerais, (Brasil).  

References

Andersson, U., & Forsgren, M. (1996). Subsidiary embeddedness and control in the multinational corporation. International Business Review, 5(5), 487-508.

Andersson, U., Björkman, I., & Forsgren, M. (2005). Managing subsidiary knowledge creation: The effect of control mechanisms on subsidiary local embeddedness. International Business Review, 14(5), 521-538.

Andersson, U., Dellestrand, H., & Pedersen, T. (2014). The contribution of local environments to competence creation in multinational enterprises. Long Range Planning, 47(1-2), 87-99.

Andersson, U., Forsgren, M., & Holm, U. (2001). Subsidiary embeddedness and competence development in MNEs a multi-level analysis. Organization Studies, 22(6), 1013-1034.

Andersson, U., Forsgren, M., & Holm, U. (2002). The strategic impact of external networks: subsidiary performance and competence development in the multinational corporation. Strategic Management Journal, 23(11), 979-996.

Andersson, U., Forsgren, M., & Holm, U. (2007). Balancing subsidiary influence in the federative MNE: a business network view. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(5), 802-818.

Batschauer da Cruz, C.B., Eliete Floriani, D., & Amal, M. (2020). The OLI Paradigm as a comprehensive model of FDI determinants: a sub-national approach. International Journal of Emerging Markets, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print.

Beleska-Spasova, E., Loykulnanta, S., & Nguyen, Q. T. (2016). Firm-specific, national and regional competitive advantages: The case of emerging market MNEs—Thailand. Asian Business & Management, 15(4), 264-291.

Beugelsdijk, S., & Mudambi, R. (2013). MNEs as border-crossing multi-location enterprises: The role of discontinuities in geographic space. Journal of International Business Studies, 44(5), 413.

Bi, Y., Ren, Z., & Bao, K. (2020). Does distance matter in foreign direct investment sub-national location choice? Evidence from China. Frontiers of Business Research in China, 14, 1-19.

Birkinshaw, J., & Hood, N. (1998). Multinational subsidiary evolution: Capability and charter change in foreign-owned subsidiary companies. Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 773-795.

Birkinshaw, J., Hood, N., & Jonsson, S. (1998). Building firm‐specific advantages in multinational corporations: the role of subsidiary initiative. Strategic Management Journal, 19(3), 221-242.

Chan, C. M., Makino, S., & Isobe, T. (2010). Does subnational region matter? Foreign affiliate performance in the United States and China. Strategic Management Journal, 31(11), 1226-1243.

Chen, M. J., & Miller, D. (2012). Competitive dynamics: Themes, trends, and a prospective research platform. The Academy of Management Annals, 6(1), 135-210.

Costa, S., Borini, F. M., & Amatucci, M. (2013). Inovação global de subsidiárias estrangeiras localizadas em mercados emergentes. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 17(4), 459-478.

de Sousa Barbosa, V., & Lemos, J. D. J. S. (2019). Diferencial de capital humano induzem desigualdades nos diferencial de produtividade do trabalho entre os estados brasileiros. Desenvolvimento em Debate, 7 (2), 11-27.

Falaster, C. D., Ferreira, M. P., Serra, F. A. R., & Storopoli, J. (2017). Institutional differences between regions within a country and ownership decisions in cross-border acquisitions. 3ES – Anpad, São Paulo: Anpad, 1-8.

Falaster, C., & Portugal Ferreira, M. (2020). Institutional factors and subnational location choice for multinationals’ R&D subsidiaries. Innovation & Management Review, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print.

Fávero, L. P., & Belfiore, P. (2017). Manual de análise de dados: estatística e modelagem multivariada com Excel®, SPSS® e Stata®. Elsevier Brasil.

Figueiredo, P. N. (2011). The role of dual embeddedness in the innovative performance of MNE subsidiaries: evidence from Brazil. Journal of Management Studies, 48(2), 417-440.

Frost, T. S., Birkinshaw, J. M., & Ensign, P. C. (2002). Centers of excellence in multinational corporations. Strategic Management Journal, 23(11), 997-1018.

Global Innovation Index. (2017). Report. Disponível em: https://www.globalinnovationindex.org/gii-2017-report#. Acesso em agosto, 2017.

Gnyawali, D. R., & Hatfield, D. E. (2007). Foreign subsidiaries’ learning from local environments: An empirical test. Management International Review, 47(1), 79-102.

Goerzen, A., Asmussen, C. G., & Nielsen, B. B. (2013). Global cities and multinational enterprise location strategy. Journal of International Business Studies, 44(5), 427-450.

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2009). Análise multivariada de dados. Bookman Editora.

Gupta, A. K., & Govindarajan, V. (2001). Global dominance: transforming global presence into global competitive advantage. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Hallin, C., Holm, U., & Sharma, D. D. (2011). Embeddedness of innovation receivers in the multinational corporation: Effects on business performance. International Business Review, 20(3), 362-373.

Holm, U., Holmström, C., & Sharma, D. (2005). Competence development through business relationships or competitive environment?-subsidiary impact on MNE competitive advantage. MIR: Management International Review, 197-218.

Holm, U., Malmberg, A., & Sölvell, Ö. (2003). Subsidiary impact on host-country economies—The case of foreign-owned subsidiaries attracting investment into Sweden. Journal of Economic Geography, 3(4), 389-408.

Hutzschenreuter, T., Matt, T., & Kleindienst, I. (2020). Going subnational: A literature review and research agenda. Journal of World Business, 55(4), 101076.

Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. (2018). Síntese de indicadores sociais: uma análise das condições de vida da população brasileira (Estudos e pesquisas. Informação demográfica e socioeconômica, n. 39). Rio de Janeiro, RJ: Autor. Disponível em: https://biblioteca.ibge.gov.br/visualizacao/livros/liv101629.pdf. Acesso em setembro, 2020.

Isaac, V. R., Borini, F. M., Raziq, M. M., & Benito, G. R. (2019). From local to global innovation: The role of subsidiaries’ external relational embeddedness in an emerging market. International Business Review, 28(4), 638-646.

Khanna, T., & Palepu, K. G. (2011). Winning in emerging markets: Spotting and responding to institutional voids. World Financial Review, (May–June 2011), 18–20.

Kim, J., & Kim, K. (2018). How does local partners network embeddedness affect international joint venture survival in different subnational contexts?. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 35(4), 1055-1080.

Korez-Vide, R., Voller, P., & Bobek, V. (2014). German and Austrian foreign direct investment in Brazilian regions: which are the location choice factors?. Journal of Management and Strategy, 5(4), 68-81.

Li, D. Y., & Liu, J. (2014). Dynamic capabilities, environmental dynamism, and competitive advantage: Evidence from China. Journal of Business Research, 67(1), 2793-2799.

Li, X., & Sun, L. (2017). How do sub-national institutional constraints impact foreign firm performance?. International Business Review, 26(3), 555-565.

Lu, J. W., Song, Y., & Shan, M. (2018). Social trust in subnational regions and foreign subsidiary performance: Evidence from foreign investments in China. Journal of International Business Studies, 49(6), 761-773.

Lu, W., Saka-Helmhout, A., & Piekkari, R. (2019). Adaptation of compensation practice in China: The role of sub-national institutions. Management and Organization Review, 15(2), 235-267.

Ma, X., Tong, T. W., & Fitza, M. (2013). How much does subnational region matter to foreign subsidiary performance? Evidence from Fortune Global 500 Corporations’ investment in China. Journal of International Business Studies, 44(1), 66-87.

Marôco, J. (2014). Análise Estatística com o SPSS Statistics. ReportNumber, Lda.

McCann, P., & Mudambi, R. (2005). Analytical differences in the economics of geography: the case of the multinational firm. Environment and Planning A, 37(10), 1857-1876.

Meyer, K. E., & Nguyen, H. V. (2005). Foreign investment strategies and sub‐national institutions in emerging markets: Evidence from Vietnam. Journal of Management Studies, 42(1), 63-93.

Meyer, K. E., Li, C., & Schotter, A. P. (2020). Managing the MNE subsidiary: Advancing a multi-level and dynamic research agenda. Journal of International Business Studies, 1-39.

Meyer, K. E., Mudambi, R., & Narula, R. (2011). Multinational enterprises and local contexts: The opportunities and challenges of multiple embeddedness. Journal of Management Studies, 48(2), 235-252.

Nell, P. C., & Andersson, U. (2012). The complexity of the business network context and its effect on subsidiary relational (over-) embeddedness. International Business Review, 21(6), 1087-1098.

Nohria, N., & Ghoshal, S. (1997). The differentiated network: Organizations knowledge flows in multinational corporations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Organização Internacional do Trabalho. (2018). Futuro do Trabalho no Brasil: Perspectivas e Diálogos Tripartites. Disponível em: https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---americas/---ro-lima/---ilo-brasilia/documents/publication/wcms_626908.pdf. Acesso em fevereiro, 2019.

Oliveira Jr, M. M., Boehe, D. M., & Borini, F. M. (2009). Estratégia e inovação em corporações multinacionais: a transformação das subsidiárias brasileiras. São Paulo: Saraiva.

Peng, G. Z., & Beamish, P. W. (2019). Subnational FDI legitimacy and foreign subsidiary survival. Journal of International Management, 25(3), 100662.

Porter, M. E. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. Harvard business review, 68(2), 73-93.

Raziq, M. M., Borini, F. M., Perry, M., & Battisti, M. (2013). Subsidiary characteristics and impact on subsidiary strategic and operational autonomy. Journal of Transnational Management, 18(3), 219-241.

Rugman, A. M., & Oh, C. H. (2013). Why the home region matters: location and regional multinationals. British Journal of Management, 24(4), 463-479.

Rugman, A. M., & Verbeke, A. (2001). Subsidiary‐specific advantages in multinational enterprises. Strategic Management Journal, 22(3), 237-250.

Rugman, A. M., Verbeke, A., & Nguyen, Q. T. (2011). Fifty years of international business theory and beyond. Management International Review, 51(6), 755-786.

Santangelo, G. D., Meyer, K. E., & Jindra, B. (2016). MNE subsidiaries’ outsourcing and insourcing of R&D: The role of local institutions. Global Strategy Journal, 6(4), 247-268.

Souza, D. M, Trovão, C. J. B. M, Silva, M. R, & Melo, J. W. F. (2019). Informalidade no Brasil: aspectos socioeconômicos dos trabalhadores informais sob a ótica regional. Interface - Revista do Centro de Ciências Sociais Aplicadas, 16 (1), 142-165.

Sull, D. N., & Escobari, M. (2005). Success against the odds: what Brazilian champions teach us about thriving in unpredictable markets. Rio de Janeiro and Cambridge, Massachusetts: Editora Campus.

Sull, D. N., & Wang, Y. (2005). Made in China: What Western managers can learn from trailblazing Chinese entrepreneurs. Harvard Business Press.

Sun, P., Qu, Z., & Liao, Z. (2018). How and when do subnational institutions matter for R&D investment? Evidence from the Chinese pharmaceutical sector. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 65(3), 379-391.

Tarraço, E.L., Bernardes, R.C., Borini, F.M., & Rossetto, D.E. (2019). Innovation capabilities for global R&D projects in subsidiaries. European Journal of Innovation Management, 22 (4), 639-659.

World Bank Group Enterprise Surveys. (2009). Enterprise Surveys what businesses experience. Disponível em: https://www.enterprisesurveys.org/data/exploreeconomies/2009/brazil. Acesso em junho, 2017.

World Bank Group Enterprise Surveys. (2009). Ranking of the top business environment obstacle for firms. Disponível em: https://www.enterprisesurveys.org/en/data/exploreeconomies/2009/brazil#2. Acesso em junho, 2017.

World Bank Group Enterprise Surveys. (2017). Indicator Descriptions. Disponível em: https://www.enterprisesurveys.org/data/exploreeconomies/2009/~/media/GIAWB/EnterpriseSurveys/Documents/Misc/Indicator-Descriptions.pdf. Acesso em setembro, 2017.

Yang, J. (2018). Subnational institutions and location choice of emerging market firms. Journal of International Management, 24(4), 317-332.

Published

2021-01-01

How to Cite

Rodrigues, C. D., Borini, F. M., Raziq, M. M., & Ferreira, M. P. (2021). Creation of Local Innovation by Foreign Subsidiaries from Specific Advantages of the Subnational Environment. Internext - International Business and Management Review, 16(1), 75–88. https://doi.org/10.18568/internext.v16i1.600

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2