Triple Helix influence on competitiveness factors: Comparison between wine clusters in Brazil and Chile

Authors

  • Eduardo Armando FIA Business School, São Paulo, SP, Brazil http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4576-1028
  • João Maurício Gama Boaventura School of Economics, Business and Accounting of the University of São Paulo, FEA/USP, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
  • Emanuela Todeva Business Clusters, Network, and Economic Development Centre, BCNED, Guildford, United Kingdom
  • Cristina Espinheira Costa Pereira Paulista University, UNIP, São Paulo, SP, Brazil

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18568/1980-4865.12343-60

Keywords:

Clusters, Competitiveness, Wine Industry, South America, Industrial Districts.

Abstract

Clusters have been studied linking their performance to the historical and geographical context, as well as to the drivers that shape the competitive strength of the nations. Among these drivers, the human factor and the university have a key role in the competitiveness of nations, as well of industries, regions and firms. In the new knowledge economy, the Triple Helix model is a mechanism of coordination that brings together government, industry and universities. The main objective of this paper is to analyse the Triple Helix influence on the competitiveness factors of clusters proposed by Zaccarelli et al (2008). The analysis is developed verifying how the Triple Helix axes influence the competitiveness factors of wine clusters, comparing the Chilean Valle del Maule to the Brazilian Serra Gaucha. The theoretical framework is the Triple Helix, combining it to the Zacarelli’s model. The method used is the multiple case study and data collection was conducted in secondary sources. The main results indicate that only four out of the eleven Zaccarelli’s model factors are influenced by the three axes of the Triple Helix. The main contribution of this paper is to bring together Triple Helix and competitiveness. There are analytical and methodological constraints.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Eduardo Armando, FIA Business School, São Paulo, SP, Brazil

holds Doctorate (2008) and Master's in Business (2003) and Undergraduation (Economic Sciences), from FEA USP. Adjunct Coordinator of FIA Business School ProCED (SME Development Center) in Sao Paulo Brazil and professor in business strategy themes at Centro Universitário FECAP, both in the lato sensu graduate program

João Maurício Gama Boaventura, School of Economics, Business and Accounting of the University of São Paulo, FEA/USP, São Paulo, SP, Brazil

holds Undergraduation in Business and Accounting, Master's (1998) and Doctorate (2004), from FEA USP. Associate professor level III at FEA-USP, where is faculty at graduate program and undergraduation, teaching themes in General Management and supervising Master and Doctorate candidates. Also works as Professor at FIA Business School, at Centro Universitário FECAP and at Universidade Paulista – UNIP graduate program.

Emanuela Todeva, Business Clusters, Network, and Economic Development Centre, BCNED, Guildford, United Kingdom

holds a Doctorate in Sociology from Sofia University, Bulgary. Currently a Professor of International Business Strategy and Innovation at St. Mary’s University in the UK and is directing the Research cluster on Globalisation, Governance and the Digital Economy.

Cristina Espinheira Costa Pereira, Paulista University, UNIP, São Paulo, SP, Brazil

holds a PhD in Business Administration from the Faculty of Economics, Administration and Accounting of the University of São Paulo (FEA-USP), with a period at the University of Surrey, England, through the Sandwich Program Abroad (PDSE) - CAPES. She holds a master's degree in Administration from the Federal University of Pernambuco (UFPE) and obtained her bachelor's degree in Business Administration from the Federal University of Alagoas (UFAL). She is currently a professor in the Master's program in Administration at Universidade Paulista (UNIP).

References

 Affuso, A., Capello, R., & Fratesi, U. (2011). Globalization and Competitive Strategies in European Vulnerable Regions. Regional Studies, 45 (5), 657–675.

 Albino, V., Carbonara, N., & Giannoccaro, I. (2006). Innovation in industrial districts: An agent-based simulation model. Int. J. Production Economics 104, 30–45.

 Asheim, B.T. & Coenen, L. (2005). Knowledge bases and regional innovation systems: Comparing Nordic clusters. Research Policy, 34 (8) 1173-1190.

 Beebe, C., Haque, F., Jarvis, C., Kenneyy, M., & Patto D. (2013). Identity Creation and Cluster Construction: The Case of the Paso Robles Wine Region. Journal of Economic Geography 13, 711–740

 Bouças, C. (2016). Aurora fecha seu maior embarque de vinhos para China e Taiwan. Valor, São Paulo, 3, 4 e 5 de dezembro de 2016, caderno Empresas, B9.

 Brundin, E.; Isaacs, E. Bleighnaul; F., Christian; Visser, K., & Wigren, C. (2008). Triple Helix Networks in a Multicultural Context: Triggers and Barriers for Fostering Growth and Sustainabilty. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 13 (1), 77-98.

 Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell D. F. J. (2012). Mode 3 Knowledge Production in Quadruple Helix Innovation Systems: 21st-Century Democracy, Innovation, and Entrepreneurship for Development. Springer Briefs in Business, Volume 7, New York, Springer.

 Cunha, S. K. da, & Neves P. (2008). Aprendizagem Tecnológica e a Teoria da Hélice Tripla: Estudo de Caso num APL de Louças. Revista de Administração e Inovação, 5 (1), 97-111.

 Cusmano, L.; Morrison, A., & Rabellotti, R. (2010) Catching up Trajectories in the Wine Sector: A Comparative Study of Chile, Italy, and South Africa. World Development, 38 (11), 1588–1602.

 Dunning, J. H. (1995). The globalization of business. London, Routledge.

 Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building Theories from Case Study Research. The Academy of Management Review, 14 (4), 532-550.

 Etzkowitz, H. (2013). Silicon Valley at risk? Sustainability of a global innovation icon: An introduction to the Special Issue. Social Science Information, 52(4), 515–538.

 Etzkowitz, H. (2012). Triple Helix clusters: boundary permeability at university–industry–government interfaces as a regional innovation strategy. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 30, 766-779.

 Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (1995). The Triple Helix – University – Industry – Government Relations: A Laboratory for Knowledge Based Economic Development. EASST Review, 14 – 14-19,

 Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The Dynamics of Innovation: From National Systems and ‘Mode2’ to a Triple Helix University – Industry – Government Relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109-123.

 Etzkowitz, H., & Ranga, M. (2010). Triple Helix System for Knowledge-Based Regional Development: From ‘Spheres’ to ‘Spaces’. IN: Proceedings of the VIII Conference Triple Helix Conference, Madrid.

 Etzkowitz, H., & Zhou, C. (2007). Regional Innovation Initiator: The Entrepreneurial University in Various Triple Helix Models. Singapore Triple Helix VI Conference Theme Paper.

 Fajnzylber, F. (1988). Competitividad internacional: evolución y lecciones. Revista de la CEPAL, Santiago, 36.

 Felzensztein, C., & Deans, K. R. (2013). Marketing practices in wine clusters: insights from Chile. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 28 (4), 357-367

 Fensterseifer, J.E. (2007), The emerging Brazilian wine industry: challenges and prospects for the Serra Gaucha wine cluster. International Journal of Wine Business Research, 19(3), 187-206.

 Fensterseifer, J. E., & Rastoin J.L. (2013), Cluster resources and competitive advantage. International Journal of Wine Business Research, 25 (4), 267-284.

 Ferreira, E.T.D., Rosina, C.D., & Mochiutti, E.F.G. (2010), Processo de produção do vinho fino tinto. Anais do IV Encontro de Engenharia de Produção Agroindustrial, Fecilcam, Campo Mourão, November 17-19.

 Gibbert, M., Ruigrok, W., & Wicki, B. (2008). What Passes as a Rigorous Case Study? Strategic Management Journal, 29, 1465–1474.

 Giuliani, E. (2013). Network dynamics in regional clusters: Evidence from Chile. Research Policy, 42, 1406– 1419.

 Giuliani, E., & Bell, M. (2005) The micro-determinants of meso-level learning and innovation: evidence from a Chilean wine cluster. Research Policy, 34, 47–68.

 Grimstad, S. (2011), Developing a framework for examining business-driven sustainability initiatives with relevance to wine tourism clusters. International Journal of Wine Business Research, 23 (1), 62 – 82.

 Guimarães, A. T. R. (2009). Empresas instaladas em clusters com orientação estratégica dual, originadas na governança de clusters e redes de negócios: uma busca ficada no negócio do vinho das regiões do Porto, em Portugal, e do Vale dos Vinhedos, no Brasil. PhD dissertation at the Business Department of the School of Economics, Business and Accountancy of the University of São Paulo - FEA/USP.

 Knocke, D. (2014). Origins of Social Network Analysis. In R. Alhajj, & J. Rokne (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining (pp. 1229-1233), New York, NY: Springer.

 Lawton Smith, H., & Bagchi-Sen, S. (2010). Triple Helix and regional development: a perspective from Oxfordshire in the UK. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 22(7), 805-818.

 Lundberg H. (2013). Triple Helix in practice: the key role of boundary spanners. European Journal of Innovation Management, 16(2), 211-226.

 Marshall, A. (1890). Principles of Economics Book Four: The Agents of Production: Land, Labour, Capital and Organization (Electronic version). Available at https://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/economics/marshall/bk4ch01.htm. Accessed on February, 21st, 2014.

 Monticelli, J. M., Garrido, I. L, Vasconcellos, S. L. (2017). Political perspectives of relationship networks to internationalization of firms in an emerging economy. Internext - Revista Eletrônica de Negócios Internacionais, 12 (2), 74-89.

 Papagiannidis, S., Li, F., Etzkowitz, H., & Clouser, M. (2009). Entrepreneurial networks: A Triple Helix approach for brokering human and social capital. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 7 (3), 215-235.

 Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park, California, Sage Publications,.

 Pereira, C.E.C., Sarturi, G., Boaventura, J.M.G., & Polo, E.F. (2014). Desenvolvimento de Métricas para Avaliação da Competitividade de Clusters: uma Aplicação Empírica no Setor Têxtil, Gestão & Regionalidade, 30 (90), 155-172.

 Porter, M. E. (1990). The Competitive Advantage of Nations. New York: The Free Press.

 Porter, M. E. (1998). Clusters and the New Economics of Competition. Harvard Business Review, November-December, 77-90.

 Power, D., & Malmberg, A. (2008). The contribution of universities to innovation and economic development: In what sense a regional problem? Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 1, 233–45.

 Ranga, M., & Etzkowitz, H. (2013). Triple Helix Systems: An Analytical Framework for Innovation Policy and Practice in the Knowledge Society. Industry and Higher Education, 27(4 ), 237-262.

 Santos, S.C., Boaventura, J.M.G., & Telles, T. (2012), Contribuição à avaliação de Clusters de negócios: o caso do Vale da Eletrônica brasileiro, Revista Científica da FAI, Santa Rita do Sapucaí, 12(1), 13-29.

 Sarturi, G.; Vargas, C. A. F.; Boaventura, J. M. G., & Santos, S.A (2016). Competitiveness of Clusters: A Comparative Analysis between Wine Industries in Chile and Brazil. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 11(2), 190 - 213.

 Siqueira, J.P.L., Gerth, F.M., & Boaventura, J.M.G. (2011), Análise da competitividade dos clusters industriais de calçados de Franca e Birigui. Revista Gestão Organizacional, 4 (2), 102-112.

 Todeva, E. (2013). Governance of Innovation and Intermediation in Triple Helix Interactions. Industry and Higher Education, 27(4), 263-278.

 Todeva, E. (2014). Network Management and Governance, In R. Alhajj, & J. Rokne (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining, 1092-1101, New York, NY: Springer.

 Ye, F. Y.; Yu, S. S., & Leydesdorff, L. (2013). The Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations at the Country Level and Its Dynamic Evolution Under the Pressures of Globalization. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(11), 2317–2325.

 Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: design and methods (2nd edition). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.

 Yuwawutto, S., Smitinont, T., Charoenanong, N., Yokakul, N., Chatratana, S., & Zawdie, G. (2010). A Triple Helix Strategy for Promoting SME Development: The Case of a Dried Banana Community Enterprise in Thailand. Industry and Higher Education, 24(3), 177-187.

 Zaccarelli, S.B., Telles, R., Siqueira, J.P.L., Boaventura, J.M.G., & Donaire, D. (2008). Clusters e Redes de Negócios: uma nova visão para a gestão dos negócios. São Paulo: Atlas.

 Zheng, P., & Harris, M. (2007). The University in the Knowledge Economy: The Triple Helix Model and Its Implications. Industry and Higher Education, 21(4), 253-263.

Downloads

Published

2017-12-12

How to Cite

Armando, E., Boaventura, J. M. G., Todeva, E., & Pereira, C. E. C. (2017). Triple Helix influence on competitiveness factors: Comparison between wine clusters in Brazil and Chile. Internext - International Business and Management Review, 12(3), 43–60. https://doi.org/10.18568/1980-4865.12343-60