Different perceptions of company leaders: Corporate social responsibility in Brazil and India

Authors

  • Mônica Cavalcanti Sá de Abreu Federal University of Ceará - UFC
  • Fernanda Rosalina da Silva Meireles Federal University of Ceará - UFC
  • Larissa Teixeira da Cunha Universidade Federal do Ceará

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18568/1980-4865.10118-29

Keywords:

Corporate Social Responsibility, Institutional Theory, Emerging Countries

Abstract

This article evaluates corporate social responsibility strategies and efforts to implement them in a Brazilian oil and gas multinational and an Indian steel multinational. Qualitative research was conducted through interviews with executives of both companies, and a content analysis and comparison of approaches to corporate social responsibility and engagement with stakeholders were made. The evidence from this research shows that the type of corporate social responsibility adopted by each company depends on the ethical values, socio-economic environment, legal and institutional framework of the country in which the firm operates.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Mônica Cavalcanti Sá de Abreu, Federal University of Ceará - UFC

PhD in Industrial Engineering at UFSC. Associate professor and coordinator of the Graduate Program of Management and Control at the Federal University of Ceará - UFC

Fernanda Rosalina da Silva Meireles, Federal University of Ceará - UFC

Master’s in Business Management and Control, Federal University of Ceará - UFC

Larissa Teixeira da Cunha, Universidade Federal do Ceará

Biological Sciences from the Institute of Biophysics Carlos Chagas Filho - UFRJ. Researcher collaborator Eduardo Penna Franca Radioisotope Laboratory at the Institute of Biophysics Carlos Chagas Filho and Project Islands Rio Mar Adentro Institute

References

ABREU, M. C. S.; BARLOW, C. Y.; SILVA FILHO, J. C. L.; SOARES, F. A. Structural reform and environmental proactivity: the case of Brazilian companies. Revista de Administração Mackenzie, v.11, n.4, p.154-177, doi: 10.1590/S1678-69712010000400007, 2010.

_____; CASTRO, F.; SOARES, F.A.; SILVA FILHO, J. C. L. A Comparative Understanding Of Corporate Social Responsibility Of Textile Firms In Brazil And China. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 20, n.1, p. 119-126, doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.08.010, 2012.

_____; CUNHA, L. T.; BARLOW, C. Institutional dynamics and organizations affecting the adoption of sustainable development in the United Kingdom and Brazil. Business Ethics: A European Review, v.24, n.1, p. 73-90, doi: 10.1111/beer.12074, 2015.

AGUILERA, R. V.; JACKSON, G. The cross-national diversity of corporate governance: dimensions and determinants. Academy of Management Review, v.28, n.3, p.443-465, doi:10.5465/AMR.2003.10196772, 2003.

_____; WILLIAMS, C.A.; CONLEY, J.M.; DE RUPP, D.E. Corporate governance and social responsibility: a comparative analysis of the UK and the US. Corporate Governance: An International Review, v.14, n.3, p.147-158, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8683.2006.00495.x, 2006.

ALON, I.; LATTEMANN, C.; FETSCHERIN, M.; LI, S.; SCHNEIDER, A-M. Usage of public corporate communications of social responsibility in Brazil, Russia, India and China (BRIC). International Journal of Emerging Markets, v.5, n.1, p.6-22, doi: 10.1108/17468801011018248, 2010.

AMALADOSS, M. X.; MANOHAR, H. L. Communicating corporate social responsibility – A case of CSR communication in emerging economies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, v.20, n.2, p.65-80, doi: 10.1002/csr.287, 2013.

 AREVALO, J. A.; ARAVIND, D. Corporate social responsibility practices in India: approach, drivers, and barriers. Corporate Governance, v.11, n.4, p.399-414, doi: 10.1108/14720701111159244, 2011.

ASADULLAH, M. N.; YALONETZKY, G. Inequality of educational opportunity in India: changes over time and across states. World Development, v.40, n.6, p.1151-1163, doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.11.008, 2012.

ASHAN, A.; PAGÉS, C. Are all labor regulations equal? Evidence from Indian manufacturing. Journal of Comparatives Economics, v. 37, n.1, p.62-75, doi:10.1016/j.jce.2008.09.001, 2009.

BBC NEWS. Brazil oil spill company in spotlight. Disponível em: < http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/1225749.stm>. Acesso em: 05 de janeiro de 2013.

BERTOLI, A. L.; RIBEIRO, M. S. Passivo ambiental: estudo de caso da Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. – Petrobras. A repercussão ambiental nas demonstrações contábeis em consequência dos acidentes ocorridos. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, v. 10, n. 2, p.117-136, doi: 10.1590/S1415- 65552006000200007, 2006.

BEVINS, V. Brazil's CSR leaders: Banco do Brasil and Natura are among the corporate social Responsibility leaders in Brazil, while foreign companies like Citi and Dow also push for CSR programs. Latin Trade. May-June, 2011.

BIRD, F.; SMUCKER, J. The social responsibilities of international business firms in developing areas. Journal of Business Ethics, v.73, n.1, p.1-9, doi: 10.1007/s10551-006-9192-4, 2007.

BUSSELL, J. L. Why get technical? Corruption and politics of public service reform in the Indian state. Comparative Political Studies, v.43, n.10, p.1230-1257, doi: 10.1177/0010414010369073, 2010.

CAPPELLIN, P.; GIULIANI, G. The Political Economy of Corporate Responsibility in Brazil: Social and Environmental Dimensions. Programme on Technology, Business and Society, Paper n.14. Geneva: UNRISD, 2004.

COLLIS, J.; HUSSEY, R. Pesquisa em administração: um guia prático para alunos de graduação e pós-graduação. 2 ed., Porto Alegre: Bookman, 2005.

CORPWATCH. Stolen for Steel: Tata Takes Tribal Lands in India. Disponível em: <http://www.corpwatch.org/article.php?id=13620>. Acesso em: 04 de abril de 2013.

DIMAGGIO, P. J.; POWELL, W. W. The iron cage revisited: institucional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, v.48, n.2, p.147-160, 1983.

DUARTE, F. Exploring the interpersonal transaction of the Brazilian jeitinho in bureaucratic contexts. Organization, v.13, n.4, p.509–527, , doi: 10.1177/1350508406065103, 2006.

DUBOCHET, L. Civil society in middle-income country: evolutions and challenges in India. Journal of International Development, v.24, n.6, p.714-727, - doi: 10.1002/jid.2863, 2012.

EHMKE, E. Political and civil society in India’s welfare trajectory. IDS Bulletin, v.42, n.6, p.104-110, - doi: 10.1111/j.1759-5436.2011.00281.x, 2011.

FÉRES, J.; REYNAUD, A. Assessing the impact of formal and informal regulations on environmental and economic performance of Brazilian manufacturing firms. Environmental and Resource Economics, v.52, n.1, p.65-85, - doi: 10.1007/s10640-011-9520-8, 2012.

GERRING, J.; KINGSTONE, P.; LANGE, M.; SINHA, A. Democracy, history, and economic performance: a case-study approach. World Development, v.39, n.10, p.1735-1748, - doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.04.029, 2011.

GOLDSTEIN, A. The internationalization of Indian companies: the case of Tata. Center for the Advanced Study of India Working Paper Series, n. 08, 2008.

GRIESSE, M. A. The geographic, political, and economic context for corporate social responsibility in Brazil. Journal of Business Ethics, v.73, n.1, p.21-37, - doi: 10.1007/s10551-006-9194-2, 2007.

HELLER, P. Democracy, participatory politics and development: some comparative lessons from Brazil, India and South Africa. Polity, v.44, n.4, p.643-665, - doi: 10.1057/pol.2012.19, 2012.

HESTON, A.; KUMAR, V. Institutional flaws and corruption incentives in India. Journal of Development Studies, v.44, n.9, p.1243-1261, - doi: 10.1080/00220380802264960, 2008.

HOFFMAN, A. J.; WOODY, J. G. Climate Change: what’s your business strategy? Boston, Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation, 2008.

JAMALI, D.; NEVILLE, B. Convergence versus divergence of CSR in developing countries: an embedded multi-layered institutional lens. Journal of Business Ethics, v.102, n.4, p.599–621, - doi: 10.1007/s10551-011-0830-0, 2011.

LEVY, D. L.; KAPLAN, R. Corporate social responsibility and theories of global governance: strategic contestation in global issue arenas. In: CRANE, A.; MCWILLIAMS, A.; MATTEN, D.; MOON, J. (org). The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility. New York: Oxford University Press, 2008, p. 432-451.

LI, S.; FETSCHERIN, M.; ALON, I.; LATTEMANN, C.; YEH, K. Corporate social responsibility in emerging markets – the importance of the governance environment. Management International Review,v.50, n.5, p.635-654, - doi: 10.1007/s11575-010-0049-9, 2010.

MATTEN, D.; MOON, J. “Implicit” and “explicit” CSR: a conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, v.33, n.2, p.404-424, - doi: 10.5465/AMR.2008.31193458, 2008.

MISHRA, S.; SUAR, D. Does corporate social responsibility influence firm performance of Indian companies? Journal of Business Ethics, v.95, n.4, p.571-601, - doi: 10.1007/s10551-010-0441-1, 2010.

MITCHELL, R. K.; AGLE, B. R.; WOOD, D. J. Toward a theory of stakeholders identification and salience: defining the principle of who and what really counts. The Academy of Management Review, v.22, n.4, p.853-886, 1997.

PEREZ-BATRES, L. A.; MILLER, V. V.; PISANI, M. J. Institutionalizing sustainability: an empirical study of corporate registration and commitment to the United Nations global compact guidelines. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 19, n.8, p.843-851, - doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.06.003, 2011.

PRIETO-CARRÓN, M.; LUND-THOMSEN, P.; CHAN, A.; MURO, A.; BHUSHAN, C. Critical perspectives on CSR and development: what we know, what we don’t know, and what we need to know. International Affair, v.82, n.5, p.977-987, - doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2346.2006.00581.x, 2006.

PORTER, M. E.; KRAMER, M. R. Strategy and Society: The Link Between Competitive Advantage and Corporate Social Responsibility. Harvard Business Review, v.84, n.12, p. 78-92, 2006.

POWER, T. J.; TAYLOR, M. M. Accountability institutions and political corruption in Brazil. In: POWER, T. J.; TAYLOR, M. M. (org). Corruption and democracy in Brazil. Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press, 2011.

ROESCH, S. A. Projetos de estágio e de pesquisa em administração: guia para estágios, trabalhos de conclusão, dissertações e estudos de caso. 3. ed., São Paulo: Atlas, 2006.

SAGAR, P.; SINGLA, A. Trust and corporate social responsibility: lessons from India. Journal of Communication Management, v.8, n.3, p.282-290, - doi: 10.1108/13632540410807691, 2004.

SANTANA, C. H. V. Liberalização financeira e sistema bancário: possíveis paralelos entre Índia e Brasil. Cadernos de Desenvolvimento, v.6, n.9, p.43-59, 2011.

SCHERER, A. G.; PALAZZO, G. Globalization and corporate social responsibility. In: CRANE, Andrew; MCWILLIAMS, A.; MATTEN, D.; MOON, J. (org). The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility. New York: Oxford University Press, 2008, p. 413-431.

SILTAOJA, M.E.; ONKILA, T. Business in society or business and society: the construction of business-society relations in responsibility reports from a critical discursive perspective. Business Ethics: A European Review, v.22, n.4, p.357–373, doi: 10.1111/beer.12028, 2013.

TATA STEEL. Awards and recognitions. Disponível em: < http://tatasteel.com/media/awards-and-recognitions.asp>. Acesso em: 28 de janeiro de 2013a.

_____; Supply chain management. Disponível em: < http://www.tatasteelenergy.com/en/products_and_services/supply_chain_management/>. Acesso em: 28 de janeiro de 2013b.

TEMPEL, A.; WALGENBACH, P. Global standardization of organizational forms and management practices? What new institutionalism and business-systems approach can learn from each other. Journal of Management Studies, v.44, n.1, p.1-24, - doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00644.x, 2007.

THEMUDO, N. S. Reassessing the impact of civil society: nonprofit sector, press freedom, and corruption. Governance: an International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, v.26, n.1, p.63-89, - doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0491.2012.01602.x, 2013.

VITALE, D.; SPÉCIE, P.; MENDES, J. S. R. Democracia global: a sociedade civil do Brasil, Índia e África do Sul na formulação da política externa ambiental de seus países. Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental, v.3, n.2, p.160-178, 2009.

VOLKEMA, R. J.; FLEURY, M. T. L. Alternative Negotiating Conditions and the Choice of Negotiation Tactics: A Cross-cultural Comparison. Journal of Business Ethics, v. 36, n.4, p. 381–398, - doi: 10.1023/A:1014496017565, 2002.

VOLPON, C. T.; MACEDO-SOARES, T. D. L. V. A. Alinhamento estratégico da responsabilidade socioambiental corporativa em empresas que atuam em redes de relacionamentos: resultados de pesquisa na Petrobras. Revista de Administração Pública, v. 41, n.3, p.391-418-, doi: 10.1590/S0034-76122007000300002, 2007.

WAMPLER, B. Entering the State: civil society activism and participatory governance in Brazil. Political Studies, v.60, n.2, p.341-362, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2011.00912.x, 2012.

YIN, R. Estudo de caso. 2 ed., Porto Alegre: Bookman, 2010.

Published

2015-05-12

How to Cite

Abreu, M. C. S. de, Meireles, F. R. da S., & Cunha, L. T. da. (2015). Different perceptions of company leaders: Corporate social responsibility in Brazil and India. Internext - International Business and Management Review, 10(1), 18–29. https://doi.org/10.18568/1980-4865.10118-29