Dimensões da ambidesteridade e desempenho organizacional das empresas exportadoras brasileiras
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18568/internext.v17i3.668Palavras-chave:
Ambidexterity organizational, Exploration, Exploitation, Sales growth, Profitability.Resumo
Objetivo: Investigar o efeito da exploração, explotação, crescimento em vendas e rentabilidade de empresas exportadoras localizadas em quatro Estados brasileiros.
Método: Os dados foram processados e analisados com base em procedimentos estatísticos multivariados e Modelagem de Equações Estruturais, com 216 empresas exportadoras localizadas em quatro Estados do Brasil, país de economia emergente.
Principais Resultados: Os achados revelam efeito positivo e significativo das dimensões de exploração e explotação sobre o crescimento de vendas e a lucratividade na amostra de empresas investigadas.
Relevância / Originalidade: As regiões analisadas são consideradas importantes para a economia brasileira por apresentarem características diferenciadas em posição geográfica, abundância de recursos naturais, exportação de produtos e diversidade de conhecimento humano. Por fim, foi desenvolvido um referencial teórico que abrange a teoria da Resource-Based View (RBV), as dimensões de exploração, explotação e desempenho organizacional.
Contribuições Teóricas / Metodológicas: A proposição de um referencial teórico com aspectos relacionais das dimensões de ambidestria (exploração e explotação) e desempenho organizacional (crescimento de vendas e lucratividade) associados à teoria RBV pode contribuir para o aprimoramento teórico das ciências administrativas.
Contribuições Sociais / para a Gestão: A amostra analisada mostrou que a baixa rentabilidade é mais propensa às capacidades de explotação. Por outro lado, as empresas com alta rentabilidade apresentaram maior inclinação para as capacidades de exploração. Empresas com baixo crescimento em vendas indicam maior inclinação para as capacidades de exploração, apesar da pequena diferença entre exploração e explotação para um grupo de empresas.
Downloads
Referências
Ahuja, G., & Katila, R. (2004). Where do resources come from? The role of idiosyncratic situations. Strategic Management Journal, 25(8-9), 887-907. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.401
Albuquerque Filho, A. R., Garcia, E. A. R., Vasconcelos, A. C., & Lima, A. C. (2021). Efeito moderador da ambidestria da inovação na relação entre internacionalização e desempenho em empresas brasileiras e europeias. Revista de Educação e Pesquisa em Contabilidade, 15(3), 329-353. https://doi.org/10.17524/repec.v15i3.2880
Ardito, L., Besson, E., Petruzzelli, A. M., & Gregori, G. L. (2018). The influence of production, IT, and logistics process innovations on ambidexterity performance. Business Process Management Journal, 24(5), 1271-1284. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-11-2017-0306
Bandeira-de-Mello, R., Fleury, M. T. L., Aveline, C. E. S., & Gama, M. A. B. (2016). Unpacking the ambidexterity implementation process in the internationalization of emerging market multinationals. Journal of Business Research, 69(6), 2005-2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.146
Barney, J. B. (1986). Organizational culture: can it be a source of sustained competitive advantage? Academy of Management Review, 11(3), 656-665. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1986.4306261
Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
Barney, J. B. (2001). Resource-based theories of competitive advantage: A ten-year retrospective on the resource-based view. Journal of Management, 27(6), 643-650. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F014920630102700602
Battaglia, D., Neirotti, P., & Paolucci, E. (2018). The role of R&D investments and export on SMEs’ growth: a domain ambidexterity perspective. Management Decision, 56(9), 1883-1903. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-02-2017-0136
Bernal, P., Maicas, J. P., & Vargas, P. (2019). Exploration, exploitation and innovation performance: disentangling the evolution of industry. Industry and Innovation, 26(3), 295-320. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2018.1465813
Burns, T., & Stalker, G. (1961). The Management of Innovation. Tavistock.
Campanella, F., Del Giudice, M., Thrassou, A., & Vrontis, D. (2020). Ambidextrous organizations in the banking sector: an empirical verification of banks’ performance and conceptual development. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 31(2), 272-302. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2016.1239122
Chakravarthy, B., & Lorange, P. (2008). Profit or growth?: why you don’t have to choose. Pearson Prentice Hall.
Chang, Y. Y., Hughes, M., & Hotho, S. (2011). Internal and external antecedents of SMEs’ innovation ambidexterity outcomes. Management Decision, 49(10), 1658-1676. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741111183816
Cho, H. J., & Pucik, V. (2005). Relationship between innovativeness, quality, growth, profitability, and market value. Strategic Management Journal, 26(6), 555-575. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.461
Derbyshire, J. (2014). The impact of ambidexterity on enterprise performance: Evidence from 15 countries and 14 sectors. Technovation, 34(10), 574-581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2014.05.010
Dierickx, I., & Cool, K. (1989). Asset Stock accumulation and the sustainability of competitive advantage: reply. Management Science, 35(12), 1504-1511. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.12.1514
Duncan, R. B. (1976). The ambidextrous organization: Designing dual structures for innovation. The Management of Organization, 1(1), 167-188.
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Brown, S. L. (1998). Competing on the edge: strategy as structured chaos. Long Range Planning, 31(5), 786-789. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0024-6301(98)00092-2
Fávero, L. P., Belfiore, P., Silva, F. L., & Chan, B. L. (2009). Análise de dados: modelagem multivariada para tomada de decisões. Elsevier.
Field, A. (2009). Finding using SPSS statistics (2nd ed.). Porto Alegre: Artmed.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
Frogeri, R. F., Portugal Jr., P. dos S., Piurcosky, F. P., Sanacato, V., Calle, J. L. de, Gazzola, S. B., & Oliveira, F. F. de. (2022). Dynamic ambidexterity: proposal of a theoretical and hypothetical model. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 26(6), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-7849rac2022210088.en
Gibson, C. B., & Birkinshaw, J. (2004). The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, 47(2), 209-226. https://doi.org/10.2307/20159573
Guerra, R. M. A. (2017). Dynamic capabilities and organizational ambidexterity as mediating variables in the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and organizational performance [Doctoral thesis on Administration, Universidade de Caxias do Sul]. Retrieved from: https://repositorio.ucs.br/xmlui/handle/11338/3019
Guerra, R. M. A., & Camargo, M. E. (2021). Understanding the logic of organizational ambidexterity. Revista Pensamento Contemporâneo em Administração, 15(1), 90-106. https://doi.org/10.12712/rpca.v15i1.49694
Hair Jr., J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2009). Análise multivariada de dados (6th ed.). Bookman.
Hambrick, D. C. (2017). Some tests of the effectiveness and functional attributes of Miles and Snow’s strategic types. Academy of Management Journal. Academy of Management, 26(1), 5-26. https://doi.org/10.5465/256132
Han, J. K., Kim, N., & Srivastava, R. K. (1998). Market orientation and organizational performance: Is innovation a missing link? Journal of Marketing, 62(4), 30-45. https://doi.org/10.2307/1252285
Han, M., & Celly, N. (2008). Strategic ambidexterity and performance in international new ventures. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 25(4), 335-349. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjas.84
He, Z. L., & Wong, P. K. (2004). Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organization Science, 15(4), 481-495. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1040.0078
Henderson, R., & Cockburn, I. (1994). Measuring competence? Exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research. Strategic Management Journal, 15(Suppl. 1), 63-84. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250150906
Hoopes, D. G., Madsen, T. L., & Walker, G. (2003). Guest editors’ introduction to the special issue: Why is there a resource-based view? Toward a theory of competitive heterogeneity. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), 889-902. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.356
Jansen, J. J. P., George, G., Van Den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2008). Senior team attributes and organizational ambidexterity the moderating role of transformational leadership. Journal of Management Studies, 45(5), 982-1007. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00775.x
Jansen, J. J. P., Tempelaar, M. P., Van den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2009a). Structural differentiation and ambidexterity: The mediating role of integration mechanisms. Organization Science, 20(4), 797-811. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1080.0415
Jansen, J. J. P., Van Den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2006). Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: Effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Management Science, 52(11), 1661-1674. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0576
Jansen, J. J. P., Vera, D., & Crossan, M. (2009b). Strategic leadership for exploration and exploitation: The moderating role of environmental dynamism. Leadership Quarterly, 20(1), 5-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2008.11.008
Karrer, D., & Fleck, D. (2015). Organizing for ambidexterity: a paradox-based typology of ambidexterity-related organizational states. Brazilian Administration Review, 12(4), 365-383. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-7692bar2015150029
Klomp, L., & Van Leeuwen, G. (2001). Linking innovation and firm performance: A new approach. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 8(3), 343-364. https://doi.org/10.1080/13571510110079612
Knight, E., & Cuganesan, S. (2020). Enabling organizational ambidexterity: Valuation practices and the senior-leadership team. Human Relations, 73(2), 190-214. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726718823247
Kollmann, T., & Stöckmann, C. (2014). Filling the entrepreneurial orientation-performance gap: The mediating effects of exploratory and exploitative innovations. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 38(5), 1001-1026. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2012.00530.x
Kristal, M. M., Huang, X., & Roth, A. V. (2010). The effect of an ambidextrous supply chain strategy on combinative competitive capabilities and business performance. Journal of Operations Management, 28(5), 415-429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2009.12.002
Lennerts, S., Schulze, A., & Tomczak, T. (2020). The asymmetric effects of exploitation and exploration on radical and incremental innovation performance: An uneven affair. European Management Journal, 38(1), 121-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2019.06.002
Li, H. & Atuahene-Gima, K. (2001). Product innovation strategy and the performance of new technology ventures in China. Academy of Management Journal, 44(6), 1123-1134. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069392
Lin, S., & Si, S. (2019). The influence of exploration and exploitation on born globals’ speed of internationalization. Management Decision, 57(1), 193-210. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-08-2017-0735
Lubatkin, M. H., Simsek, Z., Ling, Y., & Veiga, J. F. (2006). Ambidexterity and performance in small-to medium-sized firms: The pivotal role of top management team behavioral integration. Journal of Management, 32(5), 646-672. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206306290712
Madhok, A., & Keyhani, M. (2012). Acquisitions as entrepreneurship: asymmetries, opportunities and the internationalization of multinationals from emerging economies. Global Strategy and Emerging Economics, 2(1), 26-40. https://doi.org/10.1002/gsj.1023
March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71-87. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.71
Marôco, J. (2010). Análise de equações estruturais: fundamentos teóricos, software & aplicações. ReportNumber.
Marques, J. L., & Silveira-Martins, E. (2017). Pressupostos do desempenho: um estudo da ambidestria, exploração e explotação em uma rede de farmácias do rs. Gestão & Regionalidade, 33(97), 118-136. https://doi.org/10.13037/gr.vol33n97.3831
Morbey, G. K., & Reithner, R. M. (1990). How R&D affects sales growth, productivity and profitability. Research-Technology Management, 33(3), 11-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.1990.11670656
Moura, G. B., & Floriani, D. E. (2017). A evolução da ambidestria internacional nas pequenas e médias empresas (PMES). Revista de Administração FACES Journal, 16(4), 102-117. https://doi.org/10.21714/1984-6975FACES2017V16N4ART4553
Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Belknap Press of Harvard University.
Oehmichen, J., Heyden, M. L. M., Georgakakis, D., & Volberda, H. W. (2017). Boards of directors and organizational ambidexterity in knowledge-intensive firms. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 28(2), 283-306. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2016.1244904
O’Reilly III, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2008). Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator’s dilemma. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 185-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2008.06.002
O’Reilly III, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2013). Organizational ambidexterity: Past, present, and future. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), 324-338. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2013.0025
Papachroni, A., Heracleous, L., & Paroutis, S. (2015). Organizational ambidexterity through the lens of paradox theory: building a novel research agenda. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 51(1), 71-93. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886314553101
Patel, P. C., Terjesen, S., & Li, D. (2012). Enhancing effects of manufacturing flexibility through operational absorptive capacity and operational ambidexterity. Journal of Operations Management, 30(3), 201-220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2011.10.004
Peteraf, M. A. (1993). The cornerstones of competitive advantage: a resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal, 14(3), 179-191.
Peteraf, M. A., & Barney, J. B. (2003). Unraveling the resource-based tangle. Managerial and Decision Economics, 24(4), 309-323. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.1126
Peteraf, M. A., & Bergen, M. E. (2003). Scanning dynamic competitive landscapes: A market-based and resource-based framework. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), 1027-1041. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.325
Popadiuk, S. (2015). Exploração, explotação e ambidestria: inovação para a geração de valor. São Paulo: Mackenzie.
Popadiuk, S., Luz, A. R. S., & Kretschmer, C. (2018). Dynamic capabilities and ambidexterity: how are these concepts related? Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 22(5), 639-660. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-7849rac2018180135
Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., & Hayes, A. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42(1), 185-227. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273170701341316
Raisch, S., & Birkinshaw, J. (2008). Organizational ambidexterity: antecedents, outcomes, and moderators. Journal of Management, 34(3), 375-409. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308316058
Raisch, S., Birkinshaw, J., Probst, G., & Tushman, M. L. (2009). Organizational ambidexterity: Balancing exploitation and exploration for sustained performance. Organization Science, 20(4), 685-695. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0428
Rothaermel, F. T., & Alexandre, M. T. (2008). Ambidexterity in technology sourcing: the moderating role of absorptive capacity. Organization Science, 20(4), 759-780. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1080.0404
Sahi, G. K., Gupta, M. C., & Cheng, T. C. E. (2020). The effects of strategic orientation on operational ambidexterity: A study of indian SMEs in the industry 4.0 era. International Journal of Production Economics, 220, 107395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.05.014
Schulze, A., Townsend, J. D., & Talay, M. B. (2022). Completing the market orientation matrix: The impact of proactive competitor orientation on innovation and firm performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 103, 198-214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2022.03.013
Severgnini, E., Galdamez, E. V. C., & Vieira, V. A. (2019). Efeitos do exploration, exploitation e ambidestria no desempenho das organizações de software. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 23(1), 111-134. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-7849rac2019170330
Severgnini, E., Takahashi, A. R. W., & Abib, G. (2019). Risco e ambidestria organizacional: uma meta-síntese dos estudos de caso e proposta de um framework. Brazilian Business Review, 16(5), 470-499. https://doi.org/10.15728/bbr.2019.16.5.4
Silvestre, J., Borges, A. F., & Paula, V. A. F. (2022). Empreendedorismo estratégico: exploration, exploitation e ambidestria em cervejarias artesanais de Uberlândia, MG. Revista de Administração Mackenzie, 23(1), eRAMR220091. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-6971/eRAMR220091
Simsek, Z. (2009). Organizational ambidexterity: Towards a multilevel understanding. Journal of Management Studies, 46(4), 597-624. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00828.x
Tang, Q., Gu, F. F., Xie, E., & Wu, Z. (2020). Exploratory and exploitative OFDI from emerging markets: Impacts on fi rm performance. International Business Review, 29(2), 101661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2019.101661
Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319-1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812796929_0004
Tsai, W. (2001). Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44(5), 996-1004. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069443
Tuan, L. T. (2016). Organizational ambidexterity, entrepreneurial orientation, and i-deals: the moderating role of CSR. Journal of Business Ethics, 135, 145-159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2476-1
Turner, N., Swart, J., & Maylor, H. (2013). Mechanisms for managing ambidexterity: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15(3), 317-332. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2012.00343.x
Tushman, M. L., & O’Reilly III, C. A. (1996). Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Review, 38(4), 8-29. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165852
Vieira, P. R. C., & Ribas, J. R. (2011). Análise Multivariada com uso do SPSS. Ciência Moderna.
Vogel, R., & Güttel, W. H. (2013). The dynamic capability view in strategic management: A bibliometric review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15(4), 426-446. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12000
Wei, Z., Yi, Y., & Guo, H. (2014). Organizational learning ambidexterity, strategic flexibility, and new product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(4), 832-847. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12126
Wernerfelt, B. (2013). Small forces and large firms: foundations of the RBV. Strategic Management Journal, 34(6), 635-643. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2043
West, S. G., Aiken, L. S., & Krull, J. L. (1996). Experimental personality designs: analyzing categorical by continuous variable interactions. Journal of Personality, 64(1), 1-48. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1996.tb00813.x
Wilden, R., Gudergan, S. P., Nielsen, B. B., & Lings, I. (2013). Dynamic capabilities and performance: strategy, structure and environment. Long Range Planning, 46(1-2), 72-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2012.12.001
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2022 Internext
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
- O(s) autor(es) autoriza(m) a publicação do artigo na revista;
O(s) autor(es) garante(m) que a contribuição é original e inédita e que não está em processo de avaliação em outra(s) revista(s);
A revista não se responsabiliza pelas opiniões, ideias e conceitos emitidos nos textos, por serem de inteira responsabilidade de seu(s) autor(es);
É reservado aos editores o direito de proceder ajustes textuais e de adequação do artigo às normas da publicação.
Autores mantêm os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Creative Commons Atribuição 3.0 Não Adaptada, que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
Autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
Autores têm permissão e são estimulados a publicar e distribuir seu trabalho online (ex.: em repositórios institucionais ou na sua página pessoal) a qualquer ponto antes ou durante o processo editorial, já que isso pode gerar alterações produtivas, bem como aumentar o impacto e a citação do trabalho publicado (Veja O Efeito do Acesso Livre) em http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html
