Cultural Influences on Foreign Direct Investment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18568/internext.v14i2.458Palavras-chave:
Cultural influences, Foreign Direct Investment (FDI), National cultures, Cultural distance, HofstedeResumo
The current business competitive environment has influenced companies to cross national borders to explore foreign markets. The decision about in which country the company should invest isn’t easy. Many factors can influence this decision, and culture is one of factors that international business scholars have incorporated in their researches. This article deals with the influence of cultural distances on Foreign Direct Investment, specifically it aims to examine whether cultural values affects bilateral Foreign Direct Investment, that is, Foreign Direct Investment Stock. Data that include bilateral Multiple Regression Quadratic Assignment Procedure technique between 45 countries in 2007 were used, representing almost 95% of the Foreign Direct Investment Stock worldwide. The Multiple Regression Quadratic Assignment Procedure technique was used. It was found that the similarities in Power Distance between two countries positively affects the Foreign Direct Investment stock between them (it means that companies prefer countries similar from their home country) and the presence of high Uncertainty Avoidance in one or in both countries of a dyad negatively affects the Foreign Direct Investment stock between them (it means that companies avoid countries that are different from their home country). Contributions: (1) uses an innovative approach Multiple Regression Quadratic Assignment Procedure technique to analyze how individual cultural dimensions influence Foreign Direct Investment; (2) responds to the critique by Shenkar, by applying separate rather than aggregate cultural distance; (3) unveils how some cultural dimensions work in influencing FDI.
Downloads
Referências
Andersson, S. (2004). Internationalization in different industrial contexts. Journal of Business Venturing, 19, 851-875.
Baskerville, R.F. (2003). Hofstede never studied culture. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28(1), 1-14.
Berry, H., Guillén, M.F. & Zhou, N. (2010). An institutional approach to cross-national distance. Journal of International Business Studies, 41, 1-21.
Beugelsdijk, S., Kostova, T. & Roth, K. (2017). An overview of Hofstede-inspired country-level culture research in international business since 2006. Journal of International Business Studies, 48(1), 30-47.
Bhardwaj, A., Dietz, J., & Beamish, P. W. (2007). Host country cultural influences on foreign direct investment. Management International Review, 47, 29-50.
Brouthers, K., & Brouthers, L. (2001). Explaining the national culture distance paradox. Journal of International Business Studies, 32, 177-189.
Dekker, D., Krackhardt, D., & Snijders, T. (2007). Sensitivity of MRQAP test to collinearity and autocorrelation conditions. Psychometrika, 72 (4), 563-581.
Delios, A., & Henisz, W.J. (2003a). Policy uncertainty and the sequence of entry by Japanese firms, 1980-1998. Journal of International Business Studies, 34, 227-241.
Delios, A., & Henisz, W.J. (2003b). Political hazards, experience, and sequential entry strategies: the international expansion of Japanese firms, 1980-1998. Strategic Management Journal, 24, 1153-1164.
Dow, D., & Ferencikova, S. (2010). More than just cultural distance: testing new distance scales on FDI in Slovakia. International Business Review, 19, 46-48.
Drogendijk, R. & Slangen, A. (2006). Hofstede, Schwartz, or managerial perceptions? The effects of different cultural distance measures on establishment mode choices by multinational enterprises. International Business Review, 15 (4), 361-380.
Du, J., Lu, Y. & Tao, Z. (2012).Institutions and FDI location choice: the role of cultural distances. Journal of Asian Economics, 23 (2), 210-223.
Feenstra, R.C., Markusen, J.R., & Rose, A. K. (2001). Using the gravity equation to differentiate among alternative theories of trade. Canadian Journal of Economics, 34 (2), 430-447.
Feils, D.J., & Rahman, M. (2011). The impact of regional integration on insider and outsider FDI. Management International Review, 51, 41-63.
Ferraro, G. P. (2002). The cultural dimension of international business. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Gao, T. (2005). Foreign direct investment in China: how big are the roles of culture and geography? Pacific Economic Review, 10 (2), 153-166.
Ghemawat, P. (2001). Distance still matters: the hard reality of global expansion. Harvard Business Review, 79 (8), 137-147.
Goraieb, M. R. (2013). A relação entre valores culturais e Investimento Direto Estrangeiro (IDE). (Dissertação de Mestrado). Programa de Pós-Graduação em Administração, Universidade Estadual de Maringá, Maringá, Brasil.
Goulart, L., Brasil, H. V., & Arruda, C. A. (1996). A internacionalização de empresas brasileiras: motivações e alternativas. In: Fundação Dom Cabral. Internacionalização de empresas brasileiras. Rio de Janeiro: Qualitymark.
Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91 (3), 481-510.
Head, K. & Mayer, T. (2009). Illusory border effects: distance mismeasurement inflates estimates of home bias in trade. In: Bergeijk & Brakman. The Gravity Model in international trade: advances and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hejazi, W., & Ma, J. (2011). Gravity, the English language and international business. Multinational Business Review, 19 (2), 152-167.
Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: international differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, London: Sage Publications.
Hofstede, G. (1991). Culturas e Organizações: como compreender a nossa programação mental. 1. ed. Edições Síbalo: Lisboa.
Hofstede, G. (1993). Cultural constrains in management theories. Academy of Management Executive, 7 (1), 81-94.
Hofstede, G. (2003). What is culture? A reply to Baskerville. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28, 811-813.
Hofstede, G. (2006). What did GLOBE really measure? Researchers' minds versus respondents' minds. Journal of International Business Studies, 37 (6), 882-896.
Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing Cultures: The Hofstede Model in Context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1014
Hofstede, G., Hofstede, J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and Organizations: software of the mind. 3. ed. London: McGraw-Hill.
House, R., Javidan, M., Hanges, P. & Dorfman. (2002). Understanding cultures and implicit leadership theories across the globe: and introduction to project GLOBE. Journal of World Business, 37, 3-10.
International Trade Centre. ITC. (2012). Investment Map. http://legacy.intracen.org/marketanalysis/DistanceLearning.aspx. Acessed 10.05.12.
Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J. (1977). The internationalization process of the firm. Journal of International Business Studies, 8, 23-32.
Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J. (1990). The mechanism of internationalization. International Marketing Review, 7(4), 11-24.
Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J. (2003). Business relationship learning and commitment in the internationalization process. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 1 (1), 83-101.
Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J. (2006). Commitment and opportunity development in the internationalization process: a note on the Uppsala internationalization process model. Management International Review, 46(2), 165-178.
Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J. (2009). The Uppsala internationalization process model revisited: from liability of foreignness to liability of outsidership. Journal of International Business Studies, 40, 1411-1431.
Kirkman, B.L., Lowe, K.B., & Gibson, C. (2006). A quarter century of “Culture´s Consequences”: a review of empirical research incorporating Hofstede´s cultural framework. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(3), 285-320.
Kirkman, B.L., Lowe, K.B., & Gibson, C. (2017). A retrospective on “Culture´s Consequences”: the 35-year journey. Journal of International Business Studies, 48(1), 12-29.
Krackhardt, D. (1987). QAP Partialing as a Test of Spuriousness. Social Networks, 9, 171-186.
Kogut, B. & Singh, H. (1988). The Effect of National Culture on the Choice of Entry Mode. Journal of International Business Studies, 19(3), 411-432.
Leung, K.R.S., Bhagat, N.R.B., Erez, M., & Gibson, C. B. (2005). Culture and international business: recent advances and their implications for future research. Journal of International Business Studies, 36, 357-378.
López-Duarte, C., Vidal-Suárez, M.M., & González-Diaz, B. (2015). Impact of cultural positions on FDI’s entry mode. Cross Cultural Management, 22(3), 509-526.
Machado, D. D. P. N., Santos, A. F. & Pinto, V. M. (2009). Dimensões da cultura organizacional no modelo de Hofstede: aplicações em uma organização militar do exército brasileiro e um órgão público do poder judiciário. In: Seminários em Administração da FEA-USP (SemeAd), São Paulo. Anais do XII SEMEAD: Empreendedorismo e inovação. São Paulo: USP, 1, 1-16.
Makino, S., & Tsang, E.W. (2011). Historical ties and foreign direct investment: an exploratory study. Journal of International Business Studies, 32, 545-557.
Malhotra, S., Sivakumar, K., & Zhu, P. (2009). International Marketing Review, 26 (6), 651-673.
Mayer, T., & Zignago, S. (2011). Notes on CEPII’s distances measures: the GeoDist database. http://www.cepii.fr/anglaisgraph/workpap/pdf/2011/wp2011-25.pdf Acessed 20.08.12
Minkov, M. (2009). Predictors of differences in subjective well-being across 97 nations. Cross-cultural Research, 43(2), 152-179.
Mizruchi, M.S., & Marquis, C. (2006). Egocentric, sociocentric, or dyadic: Identifying the appropriate level of analysis in the study of organizational networks. Social Networks, 28 (1), 187-208.
Ozawa, T. (1979). International investment and industrial structure: new theoretical implications from the Japanese experience. Oxford Economic Papers, 31 (1), 72–92.
Polanyi, K. (1944). The Great Transformation. Boston: Beacon Press Boston.
Reinert, M. & Maciel, C.O. (2011). A influência das relações para a compreensão da semelhança na ação dos indivíduos: uma análise a partir das díades. Anais do XI Congresso Luso Afro Brasileiro de Ciências Sociais. Salvador: UFBA.
Rothaermel, F.T., Kotha, S., & Steensma, H.K. (2006). International market entry by U.S. Internet firms: an empirical analysis of country risk, national culture, and market size. Journal of Management, 32(1), 56-82.
Schweizer, R., Vahlne, J., & Johanson, J. (2010). Internationalization as an entrepreneurial process. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 8 (4), 343–370.
Shenkar, O. (2001). Cultural distance revisited: Towards a more rigorous conceptualization and measurement of cultural differences. Journal of International Business Studies, 32, 519-535.
Shenkar, O. (2012). Cultural distance revisited: Towards a more rigorous conceptualization and measurement of cultural differences. Journal of International Business Studies, 43, 1-11.
Shneider, S.C., & Arruda, C.A. (1996). Gerenciando através de culturas. In: Fundação Dom Cabral. Internacionalização de empresas brasileiras. Rio de Janeiro: Qualitymark.
Sivakumar, K.; Nakata. C. (2001). The stampede toward hofstede´s framework; avoiding the sample design pit in cross-cultural research. Journal of International Business Studies, 32 (3), 555-574.
Tang, L. (2012). The direction of cultural distance on FDI: attractiveness or incongruity? Cross Cultural Management, 19(2), 233-256.
Tanure, B., & Duarte, R. G. (2006). O impacto da Diversidade Cultural na Gestão Internacional. In: Tanure, B., & Duarte, R. G. (Orgs.) Gestão Internacional. São Paulo: Saraiva.
Tara, V., Kirkman, B. L., & Steel, P. (2010). Examining the impact of culture’s consequences: A three-decade, multilevel, meta-analytic review of Hofstede’s cultural value dimensions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(3), 405-439.
Thomas, D.E., & Grosse, R. (2001). Country-of-origin determinants of foreign direct investment in an emerging market: the case of Mexico. Journal do International Management, 7, 59-79.
Valade, B. (1995). Cultura. In: Boudon, R. Tratado de Sociologia. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar.
Yoshino, M. Y. (1976). Japan’s multinational enterprises. Cambridge, MS: Harvard University Press.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
- O(s) autor(es) autoriza(m) a publicação do artigo na revista;
O(s) autor(es) garante(m) que a contribuição é original e inédita e que não está em processo de avaliação em outra(s) revista(s);
A revista não se responsabiliza pelas opiniões, ideias e conceitos emitidos nos textos, por serem de inteira responsabilidade de seu(s) autor(es);
É reservado aos editores o direito de proceder ajustes textuais e de adequação do artigo às normas da publicação.
Autores mantêm os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Creative Commons Atribuição 3.0 Não Adaptada, que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
Autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
Autores têm permissão e são estimulados a publicar e distribuir seu trabalho online (ex.: em repositórios institucionais ou na sua página pessoal) a qualquer ponto antes ou durante o processo editorial, já que isso pode gerar alterações produtivas, bem como aumentar o impacto e a citação do trabalho publicado (Veja O Efeito do Acesso Livre) em http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html
