Como uma empresa de uma economia emergente supera as limitações e constrói legitimidade em um ambiente institucional de alta qualidade

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18568/internext.v18i1.701

Palavras-chave:

Passivo, Legitimidade, Empresa de Mercados Emergentes, Mercado Desenvolvido, Aquisição

Resumo

Objetivo: Examinar como uma empresa proveniente de um país emergente adota estratégias específicas para neutralizar os passivos de origem estrangeira (LOF), emergência (LOE) e não pertinência a redes (LOO) e para ganhar legitimidade em um ambiente institucional de alta qualidade. Método: Estudo de caso único, em profundidade, de uma empresa brasileira do setor de tecnologia da informação, com base em dados secundários e entrevistas. Principais Resultados: O estudo mostra como a aquisição de uma empresa local lidou com os três passivos: LOF, adquirindo conhecimento sobre a estrutura institucional do ambiente do país de destino; LOE, ao desvincular a imagem da empresa do país de origem e enfatizar uma imagem global; e LOO, obtendo acesso a conexões já estabelecidas em redes internacionais pela empresa adquirida. Relevância/ Originalidade: Ainda há uma escassez de literatura sobre como as empresas de outros países emergentes, além da China — e particularmente da América Latina —, adotam estratégias para atenuar LOF, LOE e LOO ao se internacionalizarem para ambientes institucionais de alta qualidade. Contribuições Teóricas/ Metodológicas: Fornecer uma visão aprofundada da relação entre LOF, LOE e LOO e suas manifestações; e proporcionar uma compreensão da relação entre os passivos enfrentados e as estratégias de legitimação adotadas para superá-los ao longo da expansão internacional de uma empresa de alta tecnologia proveniente de uma economia emergente da América Latina.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Vivian Peuker Sardon Steinhauser, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro

Professora da Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro; PhD, IAG Escola de Negócios, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro

Angela da Rocha, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro – Rio de Janeiro (RJ), Brazil

Professora da Escola de Negócios da Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro

Referências

Adomako, S., Frimpong, K., Danso, A., Amankwah-Amoah, J., Uddin, M., & Kesse, K. (2020). Home country institutional impediments and international expansion of developing country SMEs. International Business Review, 29(5), 101716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2020.101716

Aguilera, R. V., Ciravegna, L., Cuervo-Cazurra, A., & Gonzalez-Perez, M. A. (2017). Multilatinas and the internationalization of Latin American firms. Journal of World Business, 52(4), 447-460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2017.05.006

Aldrich, H. E., & Fiol, C. M. (1994). Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation. Academy of Management Review, 19(4), 645-670. https://doi.org/10.2307/258740

Almodóvar, P., & Rugman, A. M. (2015). Testing the revisited Uppsala model: does insidership improve international performance? International Marketing Review, 32(6), 686-712. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMR-04-2014-0142

Chen, J., Saarenketo, S., & Puumalainen, K. (2016). Internationalization and value orientation of entrepreneurial ventures—a Latin American perspective. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 14(1), 32-51. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10843-016-0169-9

Chen, J. H. (2017). Internationalization of Chinese firms: What role does guanxi play for overcoming their liability of outsidership in developed markets? Thunderbird International Business Review, 59(3), 367-383. https://doi.org/10.1002/tie.21877

Cheng, H. L., & Yu, C. M. J. (2008). Institutional pressures and initiation of internationalization: Evidence from Taiwanese small and medium-sized enterprises. International Business Review, 17(3), 331-348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2008.01.006

Child, J., & Rodrigues, S. B. (2005). The internationalization of Chinese firms: a case for theoretical extension? Management and Organization Review, 1(3), 381-410. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8784.2005.0020a.x

Cilo, N. (2019). “Sem as reformas, o Brasil é economicamente inviável”, diz empresário. Estado de Minas. Retrieved from: https://www.em.com.br/app/noticia/economia/2019/02/14/internas_economia,1030452/u2018sem-as-reformas-o-brasil-e-economicamente-inviavel-u2019.shtml

Cuervo-Cazurra, A. (2016). Multilatinas as a source of new theoretical insights: The learning and escape drivers of international expansion. Journal of Business Research, 69(6), 1963-1972. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.142

Cuervo-Cazurra, A. (2019). Multilatinas and international business studies. AIB Insights, 19(2), 3-7. https://doi.org/10.46697/001c.16820

Deng, P. (2012). The internationalization of Chinese firms: A critical review and future research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 14(4), 408-427. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00323.x

Denk, N., Kaufmann, L., & Roesch, J.-F. (2012). Liabilities of foreignness revisited: A review of contemporary studies and recommendations for future research. Journal of International Management, 18(4), 322-334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2012.07.001

DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147-160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101

Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550. https://doi.org/10.2307/258557

Elg, U., Ghauri, P. N., Child, J., & Collinson, S. (2017). MNE microfoundations and routines for building a legitimate ansd sustainable position in emerging markets. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38(9), 1320-1337. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2214

Fang, T., & Chimenson, D. (2017). The internationalization of Chinese firms and negative media coverage: The case of Geel’'s acquisition of Volvo Cars. Thunderbird International Business Review, 59(2), 483-502. https://doi.org/10.1002/tie.21905

Gaur, A., & Kumar, V. (2010). Internationalization of emerging market firms: a case for theoretical extension. In D. Timothy, P. Torben, & T. Laszlo (Eds.). The past, present and future of international business & management (Advances in International Management, v. 23, pp. 603-627). Emerald.

Gaur, A. S., Kumar, V., & Sarathy, R. (2011). Liability of foreignness and instrumentalization of emerging market firms. In C. Geisler Asmussen, T. Pedersen, T. M. Devinney, & L. Tihanyi (eds.). Dynamics of globalization: location-specific advantages or liabilities of foreignness? (pp. 211-233). Emerald.

Getachew, Y. S., & Beamish, P. W. (2021). Unbundling the effects of host-country institutions on foreign subsidiary survival: A case for subsidiary heterogeneity. Journal of World Business, 56(4), 101226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2021.101226

Ghauri, P. (2004). Designing and conducting case studies in international business research. In R. Marschan-Piekkari, & C. Welch (Eds.). Handbook of qualitative research methods in international business (pp. 109-124). Edward Elgar.

Gibbert, M., Ruigrok, W., & Wicki, B. (2008). What passes as a rigorous case study? Strategic Management Journal, 29(13), 1465-1474. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.722

Godinho, R. (2011). O Filho da Crise. Matrix.

Han, X. (2021). Risk management, legitimacy, and the overseas subsidiary performance of emerging market MNEs. International Business Review, 30(4), 101732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2020.101732

He, X., & Cui, L. (2012). Can strong home country institutions foster the internationalization of MNEs? Multinational Business Review, 20(4), 352-375. https://doi.org/10.1108/15253831211286264

Hermans, M., & Borda Reyes, A. (2020). A value creation perspective on international business in Latin America: directions for differentiation between emerging market multinationals. Multinational Business Review, 28(2), 157-175. https://doi.org/10.1108/MBR-03-2020-0058

Johanson, J., & Mattson, L. G. (1993). Internationalisation in industrial systems – a network approach. In P. J. Buckley, & P. Ghauri (eds.). The internationalization of the firm: a reader (pp. 303-321). Academic Press.

Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J.-E. (2009). The Uppsala internationalization process model revisited: From liability of foreignness to liability of outsidership. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(9), 1411-1431. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2009.24

Khan, Z., Amankwah-Amoah, A., Lew, Y. K., Puthusserry, P., & Czinkota, M. (2022). Strategic ambidexterity and its performance implications for emerging economies multinationals. International Business Review, 31(3), 101762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2020.101762

Kostova, T., Roth, K., & Dacin, M. T. (2008). Institutional theory in the study of multinational corporations: a critique and new directions. Academy of Management Review, 33(4), 994-1006.

Kotabe, M., & Kothari, T. (2016). Emerging market multinational companies’ evolutionary paths to building a competitive advantage from emerging markets to developed countries. Journal of World Business, 51(5), 729-743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2016.07.010

Liu, Y., & Yu, Y. (2018). Institutions, firm resources and the foreign establishment mode choices of Chinese firms: The moderating role of home regional institutional development. Journal of Business Research, 93, 111-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.04.026

Lopez-Morales, J. S. (2018). Multilatinas: a systematic literature review. Review of International Business and Strategy, 28(3-4), 331-357. https://doi.org/10.1108/RIBS-05-2018-0041

Luo, Y. (2005). Transactional characteristics, institutional environment and joint venture contracts. Journal of International Business Studies, 36(2), 209-230.

Luo, Y., & Tung, R. (2007). International expansion of emerging market enterprises: A springboard perspective. Journal of International Business Studies, 38, 481-498. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400275

Madhok, A., & Keyhani, M. (2012). Acquisitions as entrepreneurship: asymmetries, opportunities, and the internationalization of multinationals from emerging economies. Global Strategy Journal, 2(1), 26-40. https://doi.org/10.1002/gsj.1023

Marano, V., Tashman, P., & Kostova, T. (2017). Escaping the iron cage: Liabilities of origin and CSR reporting of emerging market multinational enterprises. Journal of International Business Studies, 48(3), 386-408. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2016.17

Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340-363. https://doi.org/10.1086/226550

Meyer, K. E., Estrin, S., Bhaumik, S. K., & Peng, M. W. (2009). Institutions, resources, and entry strategies in emerging economies. Strategic Management Journal, 30(1), 61-80.

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. Sage.

Miller, S., Thomas, D., Eden, L., & Hitt, M. (2008). Knee deep in the big muddy: The survival of emerging market firms in developed markets. Management International Review, 48(6), 645-666.

Nachum, L. (2003). Liability of foreignness in global competition? Financial service affiliates in the city of London. Strategic Management Journal, 24(12), 1187-1208. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.347

Nuruzzaman, N., Singh, D., & Gaur, A. S. (2020). Institutional support, hazards and internationalization. Global Strategy Journal, 10(2), 361-385. https://doi.org/10.1002/gsj.1365

Pattnaik, C., Choe, S., & Singh, D. (2015). Impact of host country institutional context on subsidiary performance. Management Decision, 53(1), 198-220. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-08-2014-0514

Paul, J., & Benito, G. R. G. (2017). A review of research on outward foreign direct investment from emerging countries, including China: what do we know, how do we know and where should we be heading? Asia Pacific Business Review, 24(1), 90-115. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602381.2017.1357316

Schweizer, R. (2013). SMEs and networks: overcoming the liability of outsidership. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 11(1), 80-103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10843-012-0097-2

Scott, W. R. (1987). The adolescence of institutional theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32(4), 493-511. The adolescence of institutional theory. Administrative Science Quarterly,

Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions and organizations: foundations for organizational science. Sage.

Sethi, D., & Judge, W. (2009). Reappraising liabilities of foreignness within an integrated perspective of the costs and benefits of doing business abroad. International Business Review, 18(4), 404-416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2009.02.006

Shapiro, D. M., Li, J., & Feng, C. M. (2020). Exploring the liability of origin: lessons from Smithfield Foods and Meat Processing in the US during Covid-19. AIB Insights, 20(3). https://doi.org/10.46697/001c.18164

Suddaby, R., Bitektine, A., & Haack, P. (2017). Legitimacy. Academy of Management Annals, 11(1), 451-478. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2015.0101

Svendsen, M. F., & Haugland, S. E. (2011). Host country institutional pressures and cross-border relationship governance. International Business Review, 20(3), 324-337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2010.10.004

Tang, R. W., & Buckley, P. J. (2020). Host country risk and foreign ownership strategy: Meta-analysis and theory on the moderating role of home country institutions. International Business Review, 29(4), 101666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2020.101666

Terjesen, S., & Hessels, J. (2009). Varieties of export-oriented entrepreneurship in Asia. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 26(3), 537-561. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-009-9138-3

Turcan, R. V., & Fraser, N. (2016). An ethnographic study of new venture and new sector legitimation: Evidence from Moldova. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 11(1), 72-88. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJoEM-10-2012-0142

UOL Economia (2018). Tecnologia a onstruerr. UOL Economia. Retrieved from https://www.uol/economia/especiais/entrevista-uol-lideres-marco-stefanini.htm#tecnologia-a-construir

Vahlne, J. E., & Johanson, J. (2017). From internationalization to evolution: The Uppsala model at 40 years. Journal of International Business Studies, 48(9), 1087-1102.

Wang, S. L., Cuervo-Cazurra, A., & Bu, J. (2017). Explicit and implicit signals for solving the liability of emergingness in exports. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2017(1), 13709. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2017.13709abstract

Wei, T., & Clegg, J. (2015). Overcoming the liability of foreignness in internationalization in emerging economies: Lessons from acquiring a Chinese firm. Thunderbird International Business Review, 57(2), 103-117. https://doi.org/10.1002/tie.21658

Wei, T., Clegg, J. & Ma, L. (2015). The conscious and unconscious facilitating role of the Chinese government in shaping the internationalization of Chinese MNCs. International Business Review, 24(2), 331-343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2014.08.008

Welch, C., Piekkari, R., Plakoyiannaki, E., & Paavilainen-Mäntymäki, E. (2011). Theorising from case studies: Towards a pluralist future for international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 42(5), 740-762.

Wu, J., Wang, C., Hong, J., Piperopoulos, P., & Zhuo, S. (2016). Internationalization and innovation performance of emerging market enterprises: The role of host-country institutional development. Journal of World Business, 51(2), 251-263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2015.09.002

Xiao, S. S., Lew, Y. K., & Park, B. I. (2020). International network searching, learning, and explorative capability: Small and medium-sized enterprises from China. Management International Review, 60(4), 597-621. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-020-00426-7

Yaprak, A., Yosun, T., & Cetindamar, D. (2018). The influence of firm-specific and country-specific advantages in the internationalization of emerging market firms: Evidence from Turkey. International Business Review, 27(1), 198-207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2017.07.001

Yin, R. K. (1989). Case study research: design and methods. Sage.

Yin, R. (1993). Applications of case study research. Sage.

Zaheer, S. (1995). Overcoming the liabilities of foreignness. Academy of Management Journal, 38(2), 341-363. https://doi.org/10.2307/256683

Zaheer, S. (2002). Liability of foreignness, redux: A commentary. Journal of International Management, 8(3), 351-358. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1075-4253(02)00070-4

Zaheer, S. & Mosakowski, E. (1997). The dynamics of the liability of foreignness: A global study of survival in financial services. Strategic Management Journal, 18(6), 439-463.

Zhang, J., Deephouse, D. L., Van Gorp, D., & Ebbers, H. (2022). Individuals’ perceptions of the legitimacy of emerging market multinationals: Ethical foundations and construct validation. Journal of Business Ethics, 176(1), 801-825. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04599-x

Zhang, W., & White, S. (2016). Overcoming the liability of newness: Entrepreneurial action and the emergence of China's private solar photovoltaic firms. Research Policy, 45(3), 604-617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.11.005

Zhou, N. (2018). Overcoming the liability of emergingness. Academy of Management Proceedings. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2018.11328abstract

Zhou, N., & Guillen, M. F. (2016). Categorizing the liability of foreignness: Ownership, location, and internalization-specific dimensions. Global Strategy Journal, 6(4), 309-329. https://doi.org/10.1002/gsj.1140

Downloads

Publicado

2023-02-02

Como Citar

Peuker Sardon Steinhauser, V., & da Rocha, A. (2023). Como uma empresa de uma economia emergente supera as limitações e constrói legitimidade em um ambiente institucional de alta qualidade. Internext, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.18568/internext.v18i1.701

Edição

Seção

Special Issue: International Business in Latin America & Caribbean