Como as capacidades institucionais das multinacionais da América Latina influenciam a propriedade nas aquisições internacionais
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18568/internext.v18i1.699Palavras-chave:
Conhecimento institucional, Ambiente institucional, Aquisições internacionais, América LatinaResumo
Objetivo: Empresas multinacionais (EMN) podem aprender com sua experiência nos países anfitriões e desenvolver uma habilidade para lidar com ineficiências institucionais específicas. Propomos que as capacidades institucionais das multinacionais, ou as capacidades para lidar com ambientes institucionalmente subdesenvolvidos, provavelmente reduzirão os requisitos de propriedade em negócios subsequentes. Método: Usando regressões com um conjunto de dados secundário de 1.686 aquisições transfronteiriças feitas por empresas latino-americanas em todo o mundo, investigamos como as capacidades previamente adquiridas das multinacionais para operar em países com qualidade regulatória subdesenvolvida, estado de direito menos efetivo e menor controle de corrupção reduzem a propriedade adquirida em acordos de aquisição subsequentes. Principais Resultados: Mostramos que multinacionais com experiência em aquisições transfronteiriças (CBA) em países com contextos institucionais fracos aprendem a trabalhar nesses contextos institucionais. Assim, essas multinacionais constroem capacidades que as tornam mais propensas a assumir uma participação acionária menor em futuras CBA. Relevância/ Originalidade: Ainda há muito a ser entendido sobre até que ponto o conhecimento desenvolvido em um país pode ser extrapolado e utilizado em outro país com problemas semelhantes. Aprofundamos esse assunto com uma visão institucional. Contribuições Teóricas/ Metodológicas: Este estudo contribui para melhor compreensão do efeito das capacidades institucionais nas participações acionárias.
Downloads
Referências
Aguilera, R., & Grøgaard, B. (2019). The dubious role of institutions in international business: A road forward. Journal of International Business Studies, 50(1), 20-35. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-018-0201-5
Ashford, B., & Gibbs, B. (1990). The double-edge of organizational legitimation. Organization Science, 1(2), 177-194. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1.2.177
Barkema, H. G., & Vermeulen, F. (1998). International expansion through start-up or acquisition: A learning perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 41(1), 7-26. https://doi.org/10.2307/256894
Chari, M., & Chang, K. 2009. Determinants of the share of equity sought in cross-border acquisitions. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(8), 1277-1297. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2008.103
Chen, S., & Hennart, J. (2002). Japanese investors’ choice of joint ventures versus wholly-owned subsidiaries in the US: The role of market barriers and firm capabilities. Journal of International Business Studies, 33(1), 1-18.
Chen, S., & Hennart, J. (2004). A hostage theory of joint ventures: Why do Japanese investors choose partial over full acquisitions to enter the United States? Journal of Business Research, 57(10), 1126-1134. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(03)00041-9
Chetty, S., Eriksson, K., & Lindbergh, J. (2006). The effect of specificity of experience on a firm’s perceived importance of institutional knowledge in an ongoing business. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(5), 699-712. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400214
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128-152. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553
Collins, J., Holcomb, T., Certo, S., Hitt, M., & Lester, R. (2009). Learning by doing: Cross-border mergers and acquisitions. Journal of Business Research, 62(12), 1329-1334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.11.005
Cuervo-Cazurra, A., & Genc, M. (2008). Transforming disadvantages into advantages: Developing country MNEs in the least developed countries. Journal of international Business Studies, 39(6), 957-979.
Dacin, M., Oliver, C., & Roy, J. (2007). The legitimacy of strategic alliances: An institutional perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 28(2), 169-187. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.577
Demirbag, M., Glaister, K., & Tatoglu, E. (2007). Institutional and transaction cost influences on MNEs’ ownership strategies of their affiliates: Evidence from an emerging market. Journal of World Business, 42(4), 418-434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2007.06.004
Deng, Z., Jean, R., & Sinkovics, R. (2018). Rapid expansion of international new ventures across institutional distance. Journal of International Business Studies, 49(8), 1010-1032. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-017-0108-6
Dikova, D., & Van Witteloostuijn, A. (2007). Foreign direct investment mode choice: entry and establishment modes in transition economies. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(6), 1013-1033.
Dikova, D., Sahib, P., & Witteloostuijn, A. (2010). Cross-border acquisition abandonment and completion: The effect of institutional differences and organizational learning in the international business service industry, 1981–2001. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(2), 223-245. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2009.10
Eden, L., & Miller, S. (2004). Distance matters: Liability of foreignness, institutional distance and ownership strategy. In M. Hitt and J. Cheng (Eds.), Theories of the Multinational Enterprise: Diversity, Complexity and Relevance (Advances in International Management, v. 16). Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp. 187-221.
Eisenhardt, K., & Martin, J. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: what are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10-11), 1105-1121. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11%3C1105::AID-SMJ133%3E3.0.CO;2-E
Elango, B., & Pattnaik, C. (2007). Building capabilities for international operations through networks: A study of Indian firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(4), 541-555.
Falaster, C., Ferreira, M., & Li, D. (2021). The influence of generalized and arbitrary institutional inefficiencies on the ownership decision in cross-border acquisitions. Journal of International Business Studies, 52(9), 1724-1749. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-021-00434-1
Filatotchev, I., Wright, M., Uhlenbruck, K., Tihanyi, L., & Hoskisson, R. (2003). Governance, organizational capabilities, and restructuring in transition economies. Journal of World Business, 38(4), 331-347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2003.08.019
Foss, N., & Pedersen, T. (2019). Microfoundations in international management research: The case of knowledge sharing in multinational corporations. Journal of International Business Studies, 50(9), 1594-1621. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-019-00270-4
Freixanet, J., & Renart, G. (2020). A capabilities perspective on the joint effects of internationalization time, speed, geographic scope and managers’ competencies on SME survival. Journal of World Business, 55(6), 101110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2020.101110
Gaffney, N., Karst, R., & Clampit, J. (2016). Emerging market MNE cross-border acquisition equity participation: The role of economic and knowledge distance. International Business Review, 25(1 Part B), 267-275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2015.05.005
Gulati, R. (1999). Network location and learning: The influence of network resources and firm capabilities on alliance formation. Strategic Management Journal, 20(5), 397-420.
Hennart, J., & Larimo, J. (1998). The impact of culture on the strategy of multinational enterprises: Does national origin affect ownership decisions? Journal of International Business Studies, 29(3), 515-538.
Henisz, W. (2000). The institutional environment for multinational investment. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 16(2), 334-364.
Hymer, S. (1960). The international operations of national firms: a study of direct investment. Ph.D Thesis, MIT.
Jackson, G., & Deeg, R. (2019). Comparing capitalism and taking institutional context seriously. Journal of International Business Studies, 50(1), 4-19. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-018-0206-0
Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2016). Worldwide governance indicators (WGI). The Worldwide Governance Indicators (WGI) Project.
Kostova, T., Beugelsdijk, S., Scott, W. R., Kunst, V. E., Chua, C. H., & van Essen, M. (2019). The construct of institutional distance through the lens of different institutional perspectives: Review, analysis, and recommendations. Journal of International Business Studies, 51(5), 467-497. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-019-00294-w
Kotabe, M., Srinivasan, S., & Aulakh, P. (2002). Multinationality and firm performance: The moderating role of R&D and marketing capabilities. Journal of International Business Studies, 33(1), 79-97.
Li, D., Wei, L. Q., Cao, Q., & Chen, D. (2021). Informal institutions, entrepreneurs’ political participation, and venture internationalization. Journal of International Business Studies, 53(6), 1062-1090. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-021-00402-9
Lu, Y., Zhou, L., Bruton, G., & Li, W. (2010). Capabilities as a mediator linking resources and the international performance of entrepreneurial firms in an emerging economy. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(3), 419-436. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2009.73
Luo, Y., & Peng, M. (1999). Learning to compete in a transition economy: Experience, environment, and performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 30(2), 269-295.
Luo, Y., & Tung, R. L. (2007). International expansion of emerging market enterprises: A springboard perspective. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(4), 481-498.
Lyles, M., & Salk, J. (1996). Knowledge acquisition from foreign parents in international joint ventures: An empirical examination in the Hungarian context. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(1), 877-903. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400243
McEvily, B., & Zaheer, A. (1999). Bridging ties: A source of firm heterogeneity in competitive capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 20(12), 1133-1156.
Meyer, K., Ding, Y., Li, J., & Zhang, H. (2014). Overcoming distrust: How state-owned enterprises adapt their foreign entries to institutional pressures abroad. Journal of International Business Studies, 45(8), 1005-1028. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2014.15
Meyer, K., & Estrin, S. (2001). Brownfield entry in emerging markets. Journal of International Business Studies, 32(3), 575-584.
North, D. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Parente, R., Rong, K., Geleilate, J., & Misati, E. (2019). Adapting and sustaining operations in weak institutional environments: A business ecosystem assessment of a Chinese MNE in Central Africa. Journal of International Business Studies, 50(2), 275-291. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-018-0179-z
Peng, M., Sun, S., Pinkham, B., & Chen, H. (2009). The Institution-Based View as a third leg for a strategy tripod. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 23(3), 63-81.
Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. (1978). The external control of organizations. New York: New York Press.
Pinto, C., Ferreira, M., Falaster, C., Fleury, M., & Fleury, A. (2017). Ownership in cross-border acquisitions and the role of government support. Journal of World Business, 52(4), 533-545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2016.08.004
Qian, L., & Delios, A. (2008). Internalization and experience: Japanese banks’ international expansion, 1980–1998. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(2), 231-248.
Rodrigues, C., Borini, F., Raziq, M., & Ferreira, M. (2021). Creation of local innovation by foreign subsidiaries from specific advantages of the subnational environment. Internext, 16(1), 75-89. https://doi.org/10.18568/internext.v16i1.600
Rodrigues, G., Vasconcellos, S., & Nunes, M. (2022). Strategy tripod: The role of institutional agents in the internationalization process. Internext, 17(1), 81-105. https://doi.org/10.18568/internext.v17i1.622
Santangelo, G. D., & Phene, A. (2021). Knowledge sourcing by the multinational enterprise: An individual creativity-based model. Journal of International Business Studies, 53(3), 434-448. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-021-00444-z
Slangen, A., & Beugelsdijk, S. (2010). The impact of institutional hazards on foreign multinational activity: A contingency perspective. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(6), 980-995. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2010.1
Uhlenbruck, K. (2004). Developing acquired foreign subsidiaries: The experience of MNEs in transition economies. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(2), 109-123.
Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185-203. https://doi.org/10.2307/4134351
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2022 Christian Falaster, Manuel Aníbal Silva Portugal Vasconcelos Ferreira
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
- O(s) autor(es) autoriza(m) a publicação do artigo na revista;
O(s) autor(es) garante(m) que a contribuição é original e inédita e que não está em processo de avaliação em outra(s) revista(s);
A revista não se responsabiliza pelas opiniões, ideias e conceitos emitidos nos textos, por serem de inteira responsabilidade de seu(s) autor(es);
É reservado aos editores o direito de proceder ajustes textuais e de adequação do artigo às normas da publicação.
Autores mantêm os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Creative Commons Atribuição 3.0 Não Adaptada, que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
Autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
Autores têm permissão e são estimulados a publicar e distribuir seu trabalho online (ex.: em repositórios institucionais ou na sua página pessoal) a qualquer ponto antes ou durante o processo editorial, já que isso pode gerar alterações produtivas, bem como aumentar o impacto e a citação do trabalho publicado (Veja O Efeito do Acesso Livre) em http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html