A Relação entre Internacionalização e Inovação nas Multinacionais de Países Emergentes

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18568/internext.v16i1.597

Palavras-chave:

Internacionalização, Intensidade de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento, Geração de Patentes.

Resumo

Objetivo: Avaliar a relação entre o grau de internacionalização, a intensidade de P&D (IP&D) e a geração de patentes nas empresas multinacionais (EMNs) dos BRICS (Brasil, Rússia, Índia, China, África do Sul).

Método:  A amostra do estudo corresponde a 219 EMNs dos BRICS, cujos dados foram obtidos de 2002 a 2010 a partir de duas bases de dados: Thomson One Datastream e Compustat Data. Análises foram feitas por regressão múltipla.

Principais resultados: Os resultados encontrados foram (i) EMNs mais internacionalizadas são as que mais investem em P&D; (ii) IP&D impacta positivamente na solicitação de patentes; (iii) a internacionalização aumenta o IP&D, que por sua vez aumenta patentes. Os resultados diferem pelo tamanho das empresas, sendo os impactos da internacionalização na inovação maiores nas empresas menores, e o impacto do IP&D na geração de patentes maior nas empresas maiores.

Relevância/originalidade: Das várias formas de relação entre inovação e internacionalização a evidência de obtenção de conhecimento a partir da internacionalização é relativamente recente e, portanto, o impacto da internacionalização sobre a inovação tem sido foco de pesquisas mais atuais. Contudo, grande parte dos trabalhos focam em um só país, principalmente os países desenvolvidos. Portanto, é de grande relevância estudar este tema em países em desenvolvimento.

Contribuições teóricas: Este estudo contribui para avançar a literatura na área de internacionalização mostrando empiricamente, que, assim como nos países desenvolvidos, nos BRICS a internacionalização tem efeito positivo na inovação.

Contribuições para gestão: Mostra a necessidade de utilizar estratégia de expansão internacional como ferramenta para ampliar sua capacidade de investimento em inovação.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Ana Claudia Bansi, Instituto Federal de São Paulo - IFSP

Ana Claudia Bansi is professor in management at the Federal Institute, Brazil. She holds a PHD from the University of São Paulo (USP) in Organizations Management. Her research interests are sustainability, innovation and internationalization of organizations.

 

Alisson Maxwell Ferreira de Andrade, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul -UFMS

Alisson Maxwell Ferreira de Andrade is professor in management at the Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul (UFMS), Brazil. He holds a PHD from the University of São Paulo (USP) in Organizations Management. His research interests are finance, internationalization and management of organizations.

Simone Vasconcelos Galina, Universidade de São Paulo Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidade de Ribeirão Preto - FEA-RP/USP

Simone Galina is an Associate Professor of Innovation, Internationalization and Operations Management at the School of Economics, Business and Accountancy of Ribeir~ao Preto at the University of S~ao Paulo (USP), Brazil. She is an Advi- sor of Master's and Doctorate students at the Graduate Program in Management of Organizations. She leads the Group of Studies on Innovation and Internationalization (ININT) at USP. Her main areas of expertise are innovation and internationalization, espe- cially in the interrelationship between them: R&D internationaliza- tion, international alliances for innovation and dynamic capabilities, on which she has published books, chapters, and papers. She has a Scholarship for Productivity as a Researcher from CNPq and currently coordinates a CNPq project and is also a Researcher in a Fapesp project on international comparative in the development of alliances for dynamic capacities and innova- tive performance. She holds a Master's degree in Computer Sci- ence and a PhD in Engineering with an internship at Lund University.

Referências

Altomonte, C., Aquilante, T., Békés, G., & Ottaviano, G. I. P. (2013). Internationalization and innovation of firms: Evidence and policy. Economic Policy, 28(76), 663-700. doi:10.1111/1468-0327.12020

Altuzarra, A. (2019). R&D and patents: is it a two way street?. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 28(2), 180-196. doi: 10.1080/10438599.2018.1449726

Andrade, A. M. F., & Galina, S. V. R. (2013). Efeitos da internacionalização sobre o desempenho de multinacionais de economias em desenvolvimento. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 17(2), 239-262. doi:10.1590/S1415-65552013000200007

Arundel, A. (2001). The relative effectiveness of patents and secrecy for appropriation. Research Policy, 30(4), 611-624. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00100-1

Awate, S., Larsen, M. M., & Mudambi, R. (2015). Accessing vs sourcing knowledge: A comparative study of R&D internationalization between emerging and advanced economy firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 46(1), 63-86. doi:10.1057/jibs.2014.46

Barrios, S., Görg, H., & Strobl, E. (2003). Explaining firms’ export behavior: R&D, spillovers and the destination market. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 65(4), 475-496. doi:10.1111/1468-0084.t01-1-00058

Belenzon, S., & Patacconi, P. (2013). Innovation and firm value: An investigation of the changing role of patents, 1985–2007. Research Policy, 42(8), 1496-1510. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.001

Blind, K., Edler, J., Frietsch, R., & Schmoch, U. (2006). Motives to patent: Empirical evidence from Germany. Research Policy, 35(5), 655-672. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2006.03.002

Bratti, M., & Felice, G. (2012). Are exporters more likely to introduce product innovations? The World Economy, 35(11), 1559-1598. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9701.2012.01453.x

Cañibano, L., García-Ayuso, M., & Sánchez, M. P. (2000). Shortcomings in the measurement of innovation: Implications for accounting standards setting. Journal of Management and Governance, 4(4), 1-24. doi:10.1023/A:1009955015494

Capaldo, A., Lavie, D., & Petruzzelli, A. (2014). Knowledge maturity and the scientific value of innovations: The roles of knowledge distance and adoption. Journal of Management, 43(2), 503-533. doi: 10.1177/0149206314535442

Capar, N., & Kotabe, M. (2003). The relationship between international diversification and performance in service firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 34(4), 345-355. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400036

Cázares, C. C., & Filipescu, D. A. (2014). Measuring the effects of internationalization on technological innovation efficiency. Paper presented at the DRUID Society Conference, Copenhagen. Retrieved from http://druid8.sit.aau.dk/acc_papers/jcp48rnj4xyvfo7oc2i4d563bhjs.pdf

Chatenier, D., Verstegen, J., Biemans, H., Mulder, M., & Omta, O. (2010). Identification of competencies for professional in open innovation teams. R&D Management, 40(3), 271-280. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9310.2010.00590.x

Chinloy, P., Jiang, C., & John, K. (2020). Investment, Depreciation and Obsolescence of R&D. Journal of Financial Stability, 49 , 1-11 . doi:10.1016/j.jfs.2020.100757

Ciabuschi, F., & Martín, O. M. (2012). Knowledge ambiguity, innovation and subsidiary performance. Baltic Journal of Management, 7 (2), 143-166. doi:10.1108/17465261211219787

Contractor, F. J., Kundu, S. K., & Hsu, C. C. (2003). A three-stage theory of expansion of international expansion: The link between multinationality and performance in the service sector. Journal of International Business Studies, 34(1), 5-18. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400003

Crescenzi, R. & Rodrıguez-Pose, A. (2017). The geography of innovation in China and India. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 41( 6), 1010-1027. doi: 10.1111/1468-2427.12554.

Doz, Y. L., Santos, J., & Williamson, P. (2001). From global to metanational: How companies win in the knowledge economy. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

Fernandes, L., Garcia, A., & Cruz, P. (2015). Desenvolvimento desigual na era do conhecimento: A participação dos BRICS na produção científica e tecnológica mundial. Contexto Internacional, 37(1), 215-253. doi:10.1590/S0102-85292015000100007

Filipescu, D. A., Prashantham, S., Rialp, A., & Rialp, J. (2013). Technological innovation and exports: Unpacking their reciprocal causality. Journal of International Marketing, 21(1), 23-38. doi:10.1509/jim.12.0099

Filippetti, A., Frenz, M., & Ietto-Gillies, G. (2012). The role of internationalization as a determinant of innovation performance: An analysis of 42 countries. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=2114289

Gaur, S. A., & Kumar, V. (2009). International diversification, business group affiliation and firm performance: Empirical evidence from India. British Journal of Management, 20(2), 172-186. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8551.2007.00558.x

Grant, R. M., Jammine, A. P., & Thomas, H. (1988). Diversity, diversification and profitability among British manufacturing companies. Academy Management Journal, 31(4), 771-801. doi: 10.5465/256338

Hair, J. F., Jr., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Hernández, H., Grassano, N., Tübke, A., Amoroso, S., Csefalvay, Z., and Gkotsis, P.: (2019). The 2019 EU Industrial R&D Investment Scoreboard; EUR 30002 EN; Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2020, ISBN 978-92-76-11261-7, doi:10.2760/04570.

Hitt, M. A., Hoskisson, R. E., & Kim, H. (1997). International diversification: Effects on innovation and firm performance in product-diversified firms. Academy of Management Journal, 40(4), 767-798. doi: 10.5465/256948

Hoskisson, R. E. (1987). Multidivisional structure and performance: The contingency of diversification strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 30(4), 625-644. doi:10.5465/AMBPP.1987.17533710

Kobrin, S. J. (1991). An empirical analysis of the determinants of global integration. Strategic Management Journal, 12(S1), 17-37. doi:10.1002/smj.4250120904

Kostopoulos, K., Spanos, Y. E., & Prastacos, G. P. (2002). The resource-based view of the firm and innovation: Identification of critical linkages. Paper presented at the Second European Academy of Management Conference, Stockholm.

Kotabe, M. (1990). The relationship between offshore sourcing and innovativeness of US multinational firms: An empirical investigation. Journal of International Business Studies, 21(4), 623-638. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490344

Kyläheiko, K., Jantunen, A., Puumalainen, K., Saarenketo, S., & Tuppura, A. (2011). Innovation and internationalization as growth strategies: The role of technological capabilities and apropriability. International Business Review, 20(5), 508-520. doi:10.1016/j.ibusrev.2010.09.004

Lu, J. W., & Beamish, P. W. (2004). International diversification and firm performance: The S-curve hypothesis. Academy of Management Journal, 47(4), 598-609. doi: 10.5465/20159604

Luo, Y., & Tung, R. L. (2007). International expansion of emerging market enterprises: A springboard perspective. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(4), 481-498. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400275

Megna, P., & Klock, M. (1993). The impact of intangible capital on Tobin´s q in the semiconductor industry. The American Economic Review, 82(2), 265-269. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2117675.pdf

Michel, A., & Shaked, I. (1986). Multinational corporations vs. domestic corporations: Financial performance and characteristics. Journal of International Business Studies, 17(3), 89-100. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490435

Miller, D. (1996). A preliminary typology of organizational learning: Synthesizing the literature. Journal of Management, 22(3), 485-505. doi: 10.1177/014920639602200305

OECD (2018). Oslo Manual 2018: Guidelines for collecting, reporting and using data on innovation. 4th Ed. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development OECD.

Papanastassiou, M., Pearce, R., & Zanfei, A. (2019). Changing perspectives on the internationalization of R&D and innovation by multinational enterprises: A review of the literature. Journal of International Business Studies, 51(4), 623-664 . doi: 10.1057/s41267-019-00258-0

Ruigrok, W., & Wagner, H. (2003). Internationalization and performance: An organizational learning perspective. Management International Review, 43(1), 63-83. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/40835634.pdf

Salomon, R. M., & Shaver, J. M. (2005). Learning by exporting: New insights from examining firm innovation. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 14(2), 431-460. doi:10.1111/j.1530-9134.2005.00047.x

Santos, J., Doz, Y., & Williamson, P. (2004). Is your innovation process global? MIT Sloan Management Review, 45(4), 31-37.

Schmiele, A. (2011). Drivers for international innovation activities in developed and emerging countries. Journal of Technology Transfer, 37(1), 98-123. doi:10.1007/s10961-011-9221-z

Soto, J. D., Manzaneque, M., Gonzáles-García, V., & Galache-Laza, T. (2019). A study of the moderating influence of R&D intensity on the family management-firm performance relationship: Evidence from Spanish private manufacturing firms. Business Research Quartely, 22(2), 105-118. doi.org/10.1016/j.brq.2018.08.007

Sugheir, J., Phan, P. H., & Hasan, I. (2012). Diversification and innovation revisited: An absorptive capacity view of technological knowledge creation. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 59(4), 530-539. doi:10.1109/TEM.2011.2165726

Siedschlag, I., & Zhang, X. (2015). Internationalisation of firms and their innovation and productivity. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 24(3), 183-203. doi: 10.1080/10438599.2014.918439

Teece, D. J. (2014). A dynamic capabilities-based entrepreneurial theory of the multinational enterprise. Journal of International Business Studies, 45(1), 8-37. doi:10.1057/jibs.2013.54

Teh, C. C., Kayo, E. K., & Kimura, H. (2008). Marcas, patentes e criação de valor. RAM – Revista de Administração Mackenzie, 9(1), 86-106. doi: 10.1590/S1678-69712008000100005

Thomas, D. E., & Eden, L. (2004). What is the shape of the multionationality performance relationship? The Multinational Business Review, 12(1), 89-110. doi:10.1108/1525383X200300015

Tsao, S. M., & Lien, W. H. (2011). Family management and internationalization: The impact on firm performance and innovation. Management International Review, 53(2) 189-213. doi:10.1007/s11575-011-0125-9

Xu, X., Xia, Y., Li, C. (2017). Influence of Chinese entrepreneurial companies’ internationalization on independent innovation: Input incentive effect and efficiency improvement effect. China Journal of Accounting Research, 10, 247–280. doi:10.1016/j.cjar.2017.05.001

Wang, Y., & Li-Ying, J. (2014). How do the BRIC countries play their roles in the global innovation arena? A study based on USPTO patents during 1990–2009. Scientometrics, 98(2), 1065-1083. doi:10.1007/s11192-013-1141-2

Williamson, P. J. (2015). The competitive advantages of emerging market multinationals: A re-assessment. Critical Perspectives on International Business, 11(3/4), 216-235. doi:10.1108/cpoib-02-2014-0008

Yang, D. (2012). Arm’s length and captive transactions: Patent-based view of control in internationalization. International Business Review, 21(4), 575-587. doi:10.1016/j.ibusrev.2011.07.004

Downloads

Publicado

2021-01-14

Como Citar

Bansi, A. C., de Andrade, A. M. F., & Galina, S. V. (2021). A Relação entre Internacionalização e Inovação nas Multinacionais de Países Emergentes. Internext, 16(1), 110–126. https://doi.org/10.18568/internext.v16i1.597

Edição

Seção

Artigos