Precarization of Work and Migration: A Review of the International Literature
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18568/internext.v15i1.527Palavras-chave:
Precarious work, Migration process, Precarization, Worker, Systematic reviewResumo
Objective: This research aims to highlight the relation between precarization of work and migration, based on the understanding that migrant workers take part assisting in the economic and social development of the countries.
Method: The methodology used was a systematic review of the international literature on precarious work and migration in the period from 2008 to 2018.
Main results: People migrate between countries for economic, social or political factors. Common of these three reasons is the desire to have a better life conditions. Even in some cases these migrants get access to benefits, they probably will suffer some kind of precariousness - whether in unhealthy services, without legal protection or living in unsuitable housing. This is the ambivalent nature of the precarious work – and its consequences.
Relevance/originality: It is observed that large part of the research on migration in the least developed countries began with propositions borrowed from researchers who codified the experience of developed countries. It is necessary in our field to present a systematic examination of how precarization and migration are addressed in the organizational studies.
Theoretical/Methodological Contributions: As a contribution to the field, in this paper it is proposed a theoretical model that involves the two phenomena and, provides the reader with standardized and systematic scientific information that may assist in the development of the field by mapping existing knowledge on this subject.
Downloads
Referências
Agergaard, S., & Ungruhe, C. (2016). Ambivalent precarity: Career trajectories and temporalities in highly skilled sports labor migration from West Africa to Northern Europe. Anthropology of Work Review, 37(2), 67-78.
Alberti, G., Holgate, J., & Tapia, M. (2013). Organising migrants as workers or as migrant workers? Intersectionality, trade unions and precarious work. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24(22), 4132-4148.
Alves, G. (2007). Dimensões da reestruturação produtiva: ensaios de sociologia do trabalho. Londrina/Bauru. Praxis/Canal, 6, 298.
Antunes, R., & Praun, L. (2015). A sociedade dos adoecimentos no trabalho. Serv. Soc. Soc., São Paulo, 123, 407-27.
Arnold, D. (2012). Social margins and precarious work in Vietnam. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(4), 468-487.
Arnold, D., & Bongiovi, J. R. (2013). Precarious, informalizing, and flexible work: Transforming concepts and understandings. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(3), 289-308.
Arthur, J. A. (1991). Interregional migration of labor in Ghana, West Africa: Determinants, consequences and policy intervention. The Review of Black political economy, 20(2), 89-103.
Bélanger, D. (2014). Labor migration and trafficking among Vietnamese migrants in Asia. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 653(1), 87-106.
Berry, D., & Bell, M. P. (2018). Worker cooperatives: alternative governance for caring and precarious work. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 37(4), 376-391.
Betti, E. (2016). Precarious work: Norm or exception of capitalism? Historicizing a contemporary debate: A global gendered perspective. The Power of the Norm: Fragile Rules and Significant Exceptions, 35.
Bresser-Pereira, L. C. (2015). After the demise of neoliberalism but not of conservatism, a third developmentalism?.
Campbell, I., & Price, R. (2016). Precarious work and precarious workers: Towards an improved conceptualisation. The Economic and Labor Relations Review, 27(3), 314-332.
Campbell, I., Boese, M., & Tham, J. C. (2016). Inhospitable workplaces? International students and paid work in food services. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 51(3), 279-298.
Canefe, N. (2016). Management of irregular migration: Syrians in Turkey as paradigm shifters for forced migration studies. New Perspectives on Turkey, 54, 9-32.
Carpenedo, M., & Caetano Nardi, H. (2013). Brazilian Women in the International Division of Reproductive Work:: Constructing Subjectivities. Revista de Estudios Sociales, (45), 96-109.
Chan, C. (2014). Gendered morality and development narratives: The case of female labor migration from Indonesia. Sustainability, 6(10), 6949-6972.
Chan, C. (2017). Migrantes como víctimas y héroes nacionales: cuestionando la migración como camino al desarrollo en Indonesia. Revista de Estudios Sociales, (59), 30-43.
Chang, D. O. (2009). Informalising labor in Asia's global factory. Journal of contemporary Asia, 39(2), 161-179.
Cooper, D. R., Schindler, P. S., & Sun, J. (2006). Business research methods (Vol. 9). New York: McGraw-Hill Irwin.
De Haas, H. (2010). Migration and development: A theoretical perspective 1. International migration review, 44(1), 227-264.
Dlamini, N., Anucha, U., & Wolfe, B. (2012). Negotiated positions: Immigrant women’s views and experiences of employment in Canada. Affilia, 27(4), 420-434.
Dyer, S., McDowell, L., & Batnitzky, A. (2011). Migrant work, precarious work–life balance: What the experiences of migrant workers in the service sector in Greater London tell us about the adult worker model. Gender, Place & Culture, 18(5), 685-700.
Falagas, M. E., Kouranos, V. D., Arencibia-Jorge, R., & Karageorgopoulos, D. E. (2008). Comparison of SCImago journal rank indicator with journal impact factor. The FASEB journal, 22(8), 2623-2628.
Fernández, M. (2018). Hanging Out Together, Surviving on Your Own: The Precarious Communities of Day Laborers. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 47(6), 865-887.
Galvão, C. M., Sawada, N. O., & Trevisan, M. A. (2009). Revisão sistemática: recurso que proporciona a incorporação das evidências na prática da enfermagem. Rev Lat Am Enferm. 2004; 12 (3): 549-56. Rev Esc Enferm USP, 43(2), 465-71.
Goldring, L., & Landolt, P. (2011). Caught in the work–citizenship matrix: The lasting effects of precarious legal status on work for Toronto immigrants. Globalizations, 8(3), 325-341.
Golgher, A. B. (2004). Fundamentos da migração. Belo Horizonte: UFMG/Cedeplar.
Gómez, Sandra Leiva., Agüero, Miguel Ángel Mansilla., & Fornes, Andrea Comelin. (2017). Condiciones laborales de migrantes bolivianas que realizan trabajo de cuidado en Iquique. Si Somos Americanos, 17(1), 11-37.
Hanson, G. H. (2009). The economic consequences of the international migration of labor. Annu. Rev. Econ., 1(1), 179-208.
Hirst, P., & Thompson, G. (1998). A Globalização em questão a economia internacional e as possibilidades de governabilidade. Petrópolis: Vozes.
Hobson, B., & Bede, L. (2015). Precariousness and capabilities: Migrant care/domestic workers in two institutional contexts. Teorija in Praksa, 52(3), 327-349.
Jordan, L. P., DeVerteuil, G., Kandt, J., Manley, D., & Wu, Q. (2017). On the edge: changing geographies of the global city precariat in London and Hong Kong. Urban geography, 38(10), 1459-1478.
Kalleberg, A. L. (2009). Precarious work, insecure workers: Employment relations in transition. American sociological review, 74(1), 1-22.
Kalleberg, A. L. (2012). Job quality and precarious work: Clarifications, controversies, and challenges. Work and Occupations, 39(4), 427-448.
Kalleberg, A. L., & Hewison, K. (2013). Precarious work and the challenge for Asia. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(3), 271-288.
Kavak, S. (2016). Syrian refugees in seasonal agricultural work: a case of adverse incorporation in Turkey. New Perspectives on Turkey, 54, 33-53.
Kim, I. H., Khang, Y. H., Muntaner, C., Chun, H., & Cho, S. I. (2008). Gender, precarious work, and chronic diseases in South Korea. American journal of industrial medicine, 51(10), 748-757.
La Boétie, É. D. (2015). Discours de la servitude volontaire. Flammarion.
Lee, E. S. (1966). A theory of migration. Demography, 3(1), 47-57.
Lima, J., & Martins Jr, A. (2012). Mobility among Latin American migrants: the case of Bolivians in São Paulo and Brazilians in London. Employee Relations, 34(6), 594-612.
Lucassen, L. (2016). Working together: new directions in global labor history. Journal of Global History, 11(1), 66-87.
Martin, N. (2011). Toward a new countermovement: a framework for interpreting the contradictory interventions of migrant civil society organizations in urban labor markets. Environment and Planning a, 43(12), 2934-2952.
Massey, D. S., Arango, J., Hugo, G., Kouaouci, A., Pellegrino, A., & Taylor, J. E. (1993). Theories of international migration: A review and appraisal. Population and development review, 19(3), 431-466.
Massey, D. S., Durand, J., & Pren, K. A. (2016). The precarious position of Latino immigrants in the United States: A comparative analysis of ethnosurvey data. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 666(1), 91-109.
McDowell, L., Batnitzky, A., & Dyer, S. (2009). Precarious work and economic migration: emerging immigrant divisions of labor in Greater London's service sector. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 33(1), 3-25.
McDowell, L., Rootham, E., & Hardgrove, A. (2016). The production of difference and maintenance of inequality: The place of young Goan men in a post‐crisis UK labor market. Gender, Work & Organization, 23(2), 108-124.
McPhee, S. R. (2016). “Finding their way”: the negotiation of the city by low-skilled service sector migrant workers in Dublin. Urban Geography, 37(3), 396-415.
Morales, L., & Giugni, M. (Eds.). (2016). Social capital, political participation and migration in Europe: making multicultural democracy work?. Springer.
Neilson, B., & Rossiter, N. (2008). Precarity as a political concept, or, Fordism as exception. Theory, Culture & Society, 25(7-8), 51-72.
Nekby, L. (2006). The emigration of immigrants, return vs onward migration: evidence from Sweden. Journal of Population Economics, 19(2), 197-226.
Onuki, H. (2016). The neoliberal governance of global labor mobility: migrant workers and the new constitutional moments of primitive accumulation. Alternatives, 41(1), 3-28.
Österle, A., & Bauer, G. (2015). The legalization of rotational 24-hour care work in Austria: Implications for migrant care workers. Social Politics, 23(2), 192-213.
Paltrinieri, L. (2017). Managing Subjectivity: Neoliberalism, Human Capital and Empowerment. Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, 10(4), 459-471.
Piper, N., & Withers, M. (2018). Forced transnationalism and temporary labor migration: implications for understanding migrant rights. Identities, 25(5), 558-575.
Sabot, R. (2019). Migration and the labor market in developing countries. Routledge.
Salgado, P. D. (2015). Deslocalización de la producción y la fuerza de trabajo: Bolivia-Argentina y las tendencias mundiales en la confección de indumentaria. Si Somos Americanos, 15(1), 169-198.
Salim, C. A. (2016). Migração: o fato e a controvérsia teórica. Anais, 119-144.
Sarturi, G., Seravalli, C., & Boaventura, J. M. G. (2015). Afinal, o que é distribuir valor para os stakeholders? Uma análise bibliográfica sobre o tema. Revista de Administração da UFSM, 8, 92-113.
Silveira, D. T., & Córdova, F. P. (2009). Unidade 2–A pesquisa científica. Métodos de pesquisa, 1.
Stewart, P., Danford, A., & Urano, E. (2017). Organizing Latin American workers in Japan: The case of the community union MIE as an alternative space of regulation. Employee Relations, 39(3), 365-377.
Strauss, K. (2018). Labor geography 1: Towards a geography of precarity?. Progress in Human Geography, 42(4), 622-630.
Sun, Z., & Chen, J. (2017). Global city and precarious work of migrants in China: A survey of seven cities. Urban Geography, 38(10), 1479-1496.
Valtonen, K. (2016). Social work and migration: Immigrant and refugee settlement and integration. Routledge.
Vera, Francisco., & Alves, E. de A. (1985). Urbanização: desafio à produtividade agrícola. Área de Informação da Sede-Artigo em periódico indexado (ALICE).
Weeks, S. (2015). Longing for “Normal” Post‐Fordism: C ape V erdean Labor‐Power on a Lisbon Periphery in Crisis. Anthropology of Work Review, 36(1), 13-25.
Wilson, S., & Ebert, N. (2013). Precarious work: Economic, sociological and political perspectives.
Young, Marisa. C. (2010). Gender differences in precarious work settings. relations industrielles/industrial relations, 65(1), 74-97.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
- O(s) autor(es) autoriza(m) a publicação do artigo na revista;
O(s) autor(es) garante(m) que a contribuição é original e inédita e que não está em processo de avaliação em outra(s) revista(s);
A revista não se responsabiliza pelas opiniões, ideias e conceitos emitidos nos textos, por serem de inteira responsabilidade de seu(s) autor(es);
É reservado aos editores o direito de proceder ajustes textuais e de adequação do artigo às normas da publicação.
Autores mantêm os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Creative Commons Atribuição 3.0 Não Adaptada, que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
Autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
Autores têm permissão e são estimulados a publicar e distribuir seu trabalho online (ex.: em repositórios institucionais ou na sua página pessoal) a qualquer ponto antes ou durante o processo editorial, já que isso pode gerar alterações produtivas, bem como aumentar o impacto e a citação do trabalho publicado (Veja O Efeito do Acesso Livre) em http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html
