Laboratórios de inovação em governo como intermediadores de problemas públicos na América Latina

Análise do Contexto Latino-americano

Autores

  • Nayara Gonçalves Lauriano Universidade Federal de Viçosa
  • Marco Aurelio Marques Ferreira Universidade Federal de Viçosa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18568/internext.v17i3.691

Palavras-chave:

Inovação pública, Laboratórios de inovação, Governo, América Latina

Resumo

RESUMO

Objetivo: Investigar os problemas associados à atuação dos laboratórios de inovação em governo (LIG) estabelecidos na América Latina e como são caracterizadas as soluções projetadas com base em suas iniciativas.

Método: Com base em pesquisa documental, foram analisados 29 tipos de projetos realizados entre 2014 e 2019 por LIG latino-americanos: LABgobar (Argentina), GNova (Brasil) e Laboratorio de Gobierno (Chile).

Principais Resultados: A atuação dessas organizações esteve associada a problemas diversificados, que revelaram enfoques próprios, bem como intervenções comuns. As soluções projetadas estiveram fundamentadas na criação de protótipos, na reunião de dados e evidências, no desenho de planos, na concepção de plataformas digitais, entre outras saídas. Estiveram também ligadas a seis necessidades principais: aprimorar processos, mudar estratégias, melhorar a atuação, atrair e atender usuários, apoiar a criação de soluções e contribuir para a cultura de inovação.

Relevância / Originalidade: O recorte de análise considerou uma região ainda sub-representada pela literatura. Ao apresentar como enfoque o contexto que alicerça o estabelecimento desses arranjos, indo além de suas características organizacionais, amplia as evidências empíricas, consideradas ainda escassas, acerca de como tais iniciativas se encaixam como ferramental de estruturas governamentais.

Contribuições Teóricas / Metodológicas: O artigo contribui para o conhecimento acerca da inovação no setor público, ampliando relatos anteriores de como governos têm sido instados a se adaptarem a novas exigências da sociedade e a promoverem novas práticas na gestão pública. Ademais, amplia a compreensão dos laboratórios de inovação, permitindo fornecer uma visão mais ampla do caso latino-americano.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Nayara Gonçalves Lauriano, Universidade Federal de Viçosa

Doutoranda e Mestre em Administração com concentração na área Pública do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Administração da Universidade Federal de Viçosa (PPGADM/UFV). Bacharel em Administração pela Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (UFJF). Especialista em Gestão Empresarial e Inovação pela PUCPR. Atua em linhas de pesquisa sobre Inovação, Desenvolvimento econômico e Indústria. Lattes: http://lattes.cnpq.br/7573151815768248. 

Marco Aurelio Marques Ferreira, Universidade Federal de Viçosa

Professor Associado, Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV). Doutor e Mestre em Economia Aplicada, UFV. Graduado em Administração, UFV. Pesquisador com Pós-Doutorado em Administração Pública pela Rutgers University - The State University of New Jersey, EUA e pela Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN). Atua em temas de pesquisa sobre Administração Pública, Governo e Sociedade. Lattes: http://lattes.cnpq.br/5928812164923260. 

Referências

Acevedo, S., & Dassen, N. (2016). Innovation for better management: the contribution of public innovation labs. Estados Unidos: IADB.

Arundel, A., Bloch, C., & Ferguson, B. (2019). Advancing innovation in the public sector: Aligning innovation measurement with policy goals. Research Policy, 48(3), 789-798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.12.001

Bason, C. (2010). Leading public sector innovation. Bristol: Policy Press.

Bekkers, V., Edelenbos, J., & Steijn, B. (2011). An innovative public sector? Embarking on the innovation journey. In V. Bekkers, J. Edelenbos, & B. Steijn (eds.), Innovation in the Public Sector, 197-221. Londres: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230307520_10

Bekkers, V., & Tummers, L. (2018). Innovation in the public sector: Towards an open and collaborative approach. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 84(2), 209-213. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0020852318761797

Bloch, C., & Bugge, M. M. (2013). Public sector innovation: from theory to measurement. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 27, 133-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2013.06.008

Blomkamp, E. (2018). The promise of co‐design for public policy. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 77(4), 729-743. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12310

Capdevila, I. (2015). How can city labs enhance the citizens’ motivation in different types of innovation activities? In L. M. Aiello, & D. McFarland (ed.), International Conference on Social Informatics (pp. 64-71). Cham: Springer.

Cardullo, P., Kitchin, R., & Di Feliciantonio, C. (2018). Living labs and vacancy in the neoliberal city. Cities, 73, 44-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.10.008

Carstensen, H. V., & Bason, C. (2012). Powering collaborative policy innovation: Can innovation labs help. The Innovation Journal, 17(1), 1-26.

Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open innovation: the new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business Press.

Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2011). Complexity and hybrid public administration—theoretical and empirical challenges. Public Organization Review, 11(4), 407-423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-010-0141-4

Criado, J. I., Dias, T. F., Sano, H., Rojas-Martín, F., Silvan, A., & Isidro Filho, A. (2021). Public innovation and living labs in action: a comparative analysis in Post-New Public Management contexts. International Journal of Public Administration, 44(6), 451-464. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2020.1729181

Criado, J. I., Rojas-Martín, F., & Silván, A. (2017). Laboratorios de innovación para cambiar la gestión pública: análisis del caso NovaGob.Lab. Revista de Gestión Pública, 6(1), 19-42. https://doi.org/10.22370/rgp.2017.6.1.2214

Dente, B., Bobbio, L., & Spada, A. (2005). Government or governance of public innovation? The Planning Review, 41(162), 41-52. https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2005.10556931

De Vries, H., Bekkers, V., & Tummers, L. (2016). Innovation in the public sector: A systematic review and future research agenda. Public Administration, 94(1), 146-166. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12209

Evans, B., & Cheng, S. M. (2021). Canadian government policy innovation labs: An experimental turn in policy work?. Canadian Public Administration, 64(4), 587-610. https://doi.org/10.1111/capa.12438

Ferrarezi, E., Lemos, J., & Brandalise, I. (2018). Experimentação e novas possibilidades em governo: aprendizados de um laboratório de inovação. Brasília: Enap.

Ferreira, M., & Botero, A. (2020). Experimental governance? The emergence of public sector innovation labs in Latin America. Policy Design and Practice, 3(2), 150-162. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2020.1759761

Fuglsang, L., & Hansen, A. V. (2022). Framing improvements of public innovation in a living lab context: Processual learning, restrained space and democratic engagement. Research Policy, 51(1), 104390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104390

Fuglsang, L., Hansen, A. V., Mergel, I., & Røhnebæk, M. T. (2021). Living Labs for Public Sector Innovation: An Integrative Literature Review. Administrative Sciences, 11(2), 58. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci11020058

Gascó, M. (2017). Living labs: Implementing open innovation in the public sector. Government Information Quarterly, 34(1), 90-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.09.003

Haug, N., & Mergel, I. (2021). Public value co-creation in living labs: results from three case studies. Administrative Sciences, 11(3), 74. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci11030074

Head, B. W. (2019). Forty years of wicked problems literature: Forging closer links to policy studies. Policy and Society, 38(2), 180-197. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2018.1488797

Hill, M., & Hupe, P. (2002). Implementing public policy: governance in theory and in practice. Sage.

Joy, M., Shields, J., & Cheng, S. M. (2019). Social innovation labs: a neoliberal austerity driven process or democratic intervention? Alternate Routes, 30(2), 35-54.

Kelly, G., Mulgan, G., & Muers, S. (2002). Creating public value: an analytical framework for public service reform. Londres: Strategy Unit, HM Government.

Kim, S., Wellstead, A. M., & Heikkila, T. (2022). Policy capacity and rise of data‐based policy innovation labs. Review of Policy Research, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12494

Kimbell, L., & Bailey, J. (2017). Prototyping and the new spirit of policy-making. CoDesign, 13(3), 214-226. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2017.1355003

Klenk, T., & Reiter, R. (2019). Post-new public management: Reform ideas and their application in the field of social services. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 85(1), 3-10. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0020852318810883

Lewis, J. M. (2021). The limits of policy labs: characteristics, opportunities and constraints. Policy Design and Practice, 4(2), 242-251. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2020.1859077

Lewis, J. M., Ricard, L. M., & Klijn, E. H. (2018). How innovation drivers, networking and leadership shape public sector innovation capacity. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 84(2), 288-307. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852317694085

McGann, M., Blomkamp, E., & Lewis, J. M. (2018). The rise of public sector innovation labs: experiments in design thinking for policy. Policy Sciences, 51(3), 249-267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-018-9315-7

McGann, M., Wells, T., & Blomkamp, E. (2021). Innovation labs and co-production in public problem solving. Public Management Review, 23(2), 297-316. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1699946

Meijer, A. (2019). Public innovation capacity: developing and testing a self-assessment survey instrument. International Journal of Public Administration, 42(8), 617-627. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2018.1498102

Mergel, I., Edelmann, N., & Haug, N. (2019). Defining digital transformation: Results from expert interviews. Government Information Quarterly, 36(4), 101385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.06.002

Ministerio del Interior y Seguridad Pública, BID, & Laboratorio de Gobierno (2017). Informe de ideas de solución locales en materias de seguridad. Recuperado de https://www.lab.gob.cl/uploads/filer_public/d4/07/d407849f-3978-4420-86d4-dbfb706e62ec/proyecto_percepcion_seguridad_-_informe_consolidado_de_talleres.pdf

Mosse, B., & Whitley, E. A. (2009). Critically classifying: UK e‐government website benchmarking and the recasting of the citizen as customer. Information Systems Journal, 19(2), 149-173. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2008.00299.x

Mulgan, G. (2007). Ready or not?: Taking innovation in the public sector seriously. Nesta Provocation 03.

Muzzio, H., & Gama, M. (2021). Collaborative idea generation: An experience of open creativity in the public sector. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems. https://doi.org/10.1108/VJIKMS-07-2021-0112

Olejniczak, K., Borkowska-Waszak, S., Domaradzka-Widła, A., & Park, Y. (2020). Policy labs: the next frontier of policy design and evaluation? Policy & Politics, 48(1), 89-110. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557319X15579230420108

Organização para a Cooperação e Desenvolvimento Econômico (OECD) (2015). The Innovation Imperative in the Public Sector: Setting an Agenda for Action. Paris: OECD Publishing.

Parsons Desis Lab (2013). Government Innovation Lab Constellation. Recuperado de: http://nyc.pubcollab.org/files/Gov_Innovation_Labs-Constellation_1.0.pdf

Pascale, P., & Resina, J. (2020). Prototipando las instituciones del futuro: el caso de los laboratorios de innovación ciudadana (Labic). Revista Iberoamericana de Estudios de Desarrollo, 9(1), 6-27. https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs_ried/ijds.437

Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2011). Continuity and change in public policy and management. Edward Elgar Publishing.

Potts, J., & Kastelle, T. (2010). Public sector innovation research: What’s next? Innovation, 12(2), 122-137. https://doi.org/10.5172/impp.12.2.122

Programa das Nações Unidas para o Desenvolvimento (UNDP) (2017). Growing government innovation labs: an insider’s guide. Estados Unidos: UNDP.

Puttick, R., Baeck, P., & Colligan, P. (2014). I-Teams: The teams and funds making innovation happen in governments around the world. Nesta.

Ramírez-Alujas, Á. (2016). Laboratorios de gobierno como plataformas para la innovación pública. La Innovación en el Sector Público: Tendencias Internacionales y Experiencias Mexicanas. México: INAP-CIDE.

Rizzo, F., Deserti, A., & Cobanli, O. M. (2017). Introducing design thinking in social innovation and in public sector: a design-based learning framework. European Public & Social Innovation Review, 2(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir.17-1.9

Rodríguez, E., & Grandinetti, R. (2018). Laboratorios de gobierno para la innovación pública: un estudio comparado de las experiencias americanas y europeas. Programa CYTED. Recuperado de: https://www.cyted.org/sites/default/files/doc_goblabs_redinnolabs.pdf

Sano, H. (2020). Laboratórios de inovação no setor público: mapeamento e diagnóstico de experiências nacionais. Brasília: Enap.

Scholl, C., & Kemp, R. (2016). City labs as vehicles for innovation in urban planning processes. Urban Planning, 1(4), 89-102. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v1i4.749

Schuurman, D., & Tõnurist, P. (2017). Innovation in the public sector: exploring the characteristics and potential of living labs and innovation labs. Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(1), 7-14. http://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1045s

Timeus, K., & Gascó, M. (2018). Increasing innovation capacity in city governments: Do innovation labs make a difference? Journal of Urban Affairs, 40(7), 992-1008. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2018.1431049

Tõnurist, P., Kattel, R., & Lember, V. (2015). Discovering innovation labs in the public sector. The Other Canon, Foundation and Tallinn University of Technology Working Papers in Technology Governance and Economic Dynamics, TUT Ragnar Nurkse School of Innovation and Governance.

Tõnurist, P., Kattel, R., & Lember, V. (2017). Innovation labs in the public sector: what they are and what they do? Public Management Review, 19(10), 1455-1479. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1287939

Torfing, J. (2019). Collaborative innovation in the public sector: The argument. Public Management Review, 21(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2018.1430248

Unceta, A., Barandiaran, X., & Restrepo, N. (2019). The role of public innovation labs in collaborative governance: the case of the Gipuzkoa Lab in the Basque Country, Spain. Sustainability, 11(21), 6103. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11216103

Waardenburg, M., Groenleer, M., & De Jong, J. (2020). Designing environments for experimentation, learning and innovation in public policy and governance. Policy & Politics, 48(1), 67-87. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557319X15586040837640

Wagenaar, H., & Wood, M. (2018). The precarious politics of public innovation. Politics and Governance, 6(1), 150-160. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v6i1.1275

Whicher, A., & Crick, T. (2019). Co-design, evaluation and the Northern Ireland innovation lab. Public Money & Management, 39(4), 290-299. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2019.1592920

Williamson, B. (2014). New governing experts in education: Self-learning software, policy labs and transactional pedagogies. In T. Fenwick, E., Mangez, & J. Ozga, (eds), Governing knowledge: comparison, knowledge-based technologies and expertise in the regulation of education (pp. 1-18). Londres: Routledge.

Williamson, B. (2015a). Governing methods: policy innovation labs, design and data science in the digital governance of education. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 47(3), 251-271. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220620.2015.1038693

Williamson, B. (2015b). Testing governance: the laboratory lives and methods of policy innovation labs. Stirling: University of Stirling. Recuperado de: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/42544676.pdf

Young, M. M. (2020). Implementation of digital era governance: the case of open data in US cities. Public Administration Review, 80(2), 305-315. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13156

Downloads

Publicado

2022-09-23

Como Citar

Gonçalves Lauriano, N., & Marques Ferreira, M. A. (2022). Laboratórios de inovação em governo como intermediadores de problemas públicos na América Latina: Análise do Contexto Latino-americano. Internext, 17(3). https://doi.org/10.18568/internext.v17i3.691