How institutional voids influence Brazilian foreign direct investment in Angola

Renato Virches, Fernanda Ribeiro Cahen

Resumo


How do institutional voids influence emerging market multinationals (EMNEs) foreign direct investment (FDI) in developing countries? In this article we respond to this question by examining Brazilian FDI in Angola as our analytical setting. We focus on the host country’s institutions and its institutional voids as essential factors that attract the FDI of EMNES to developing countries. The research indicates that Brazilian companies fill in much of these voids within the market intermediaries, often creating a point of competitive advantage, and also creating advantages in relation to FDI from other economies that invest in Angola. The scarce literature on FDI in Africa has been largely dedicated to the analysis of Chinese investment in the region. We aim to complement recent research on the influence of the host country’s institutions on the behavior of FDI in developing countries, explaining how some EMNEs are able to use the institutional voids of developing countries as market opportunities. Our findings should provide also implications for EMNEs managers from other emerging markets by providing a better understanding of how Brazilian multinationals expand their business in less developed countries, handle institutional voids and manage relationships with local and foreign institutions in the host country.


Palavras-chave


Brazilian FDI; Africa; Multinationals from emerging markets; Institutional voids

Texto completo:

PDF (English)

Referências


▪ Adeleye, I., Ibeh, K., Kinoti, A., & White, L. (Eds.) (2015). The Changing Dynamics of International Business in Africa (AIB Sub-Saharan Africa {SSA} Series). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

▪ Agência Brasileira de Promoção de Exportações e Investimentos {ApexBrasil} (2012). Angola - Perfil e oportunidades comerciais. Retrieved from http://www.apexbrasil.com.br/Content/imagens/d806c1ec-c36a-4d8f-be6b-8b91fdc7f29b.pdf.

▪ Asiedu, E. (2002). On the determinants of foreign direct investment to developing countries: is Africa different? World Development, 3(1), 107-119.

▪ Aykut, D., & Goldstein, A. (2007). Developing Country Multinationals: South-South Investment Comes of Age. In Industrial development for the 21st century: sustainable development perspectives (pp.85-116). New York: United Nations.

▪ Balasubramanyam, V. N. (2015). China and India’s economic relations with African countries – neo-colonialism eastern style? Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies, 3(1), 17-31.

▪ Banco Mundial & Instituto de Pesquisas Econômicas Aplicadas (2011). Ponte sobre o Atlântico: Brasil e África Subsaariana - parceria Sul-Sul para o crescimento. Brasília: IPEA. Retrieved from: http://www.ipea.gov.br/portal/images/stories/PDFs/livros/livros/111222_livropontesobreoatlanticopor2.pdf

▪ BBC Brasil (2013). Brics competem para ganhar terreno na África (26 mar. 2013). Retrieved from http://www.bbc.co.uk/portuguese/noticias/2013/03/130326_brics_rc.

▪ Berg, B; Lune, H. (2008). Unobstrotuve measures in research. In Qualitative research method for the social science. Boston: Pearson.

▪ Broadman, H.G. (2011). The backstory of China and India's growing investment and trade with Africa: separating the wheat from the chaff. Columbia FDI Perspectives, n. 34, February 17, 2011. Retrieved from http://ccsi.columbia.edu/files/2014/01/FDI_34.pdf.

▪ Chacar, A. S., Newburry, W., & Vissa, B. (2010). Bringing institutions into performance persistence research: Exploring the impact of product, financial, and labor market institutions. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(7), 1119-1140.

▪ Chakrabarti, S., & Ghosh, I. (2014). FDI in Africa: A comparison of the Indian and Chinese experience. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 157, 340-352.

▪ Chang, S. J., & Hong, J. (2000). Economic performance of group-affiliated companies in Korea: Intragroup resource sharing and internal business transactions. Academy of Management Journal, 43(3), 429-448. ▪ Conferência das Nações Unidas sobre Comércio e Desenvolvimento {UNCTAD} (2013b). Quem se beneficia com a liberalização do comércio em Angola? Uma perspectiva de gênero. UNCTAD/DITC/2013/3 (L. S. Magalhães, Trad.). Retrieved from http://unctad.org/en/PublicationChapters/ditc2013d3_pr.pdf.

▪ Creswell, J. W. (2012). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

▪ Cuervo-Cazurra, A., Inkpen, A., Musacchio, A., & Ramaswamy, K. (2014). Governments as owners: State-owned multinational companies. Journal of International Business Studies, 45(8), 919-942.

▪ Dunning, J. H. (2001). The eclectic (OLI) paradigm of international production: past, present and future. Journal of the Economics of Business, 8(2), 173-190.

▪ Dupasquier, C., & Osakwe, P. N. (2006). Foreign direct investment in Africa: performance, challenges and responsibilities. Journal of Asian Economics, 17(2), 241-260.

▪ Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550.

▪ Garcia, A. S., Kato, K., & Fontes, C. (2014). A história contada pela caça ou pelo caçador? Reflexões sobre a inserção do Brasil na África. Tensões Mundiais, 10(18-19), 145-171.

▪ Ghauri, P. (2004). Designing and conducting case studies in international business research. In R. Marschan-Piekkari & C. Welch (Eds.) Handbook of Qualitative Research Methods for International Business (pp. 109-124). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar

▪ Guillén, M. F., & García-Canal, E. (2009). The American model of the multinational firm and the “new” multinationals from emerging economies. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 23(2), 23-359.

▪ Iglesias, R. M., & Costa, K. (2011). O investimento direto brasileiro na África. Textos CINDES, n. 27. Retrieved from http://www.cindesbrasil.org/site/index.php?option=com_jdownloads&Itemid=62&view=finish&cid=616&catid=7

▪ Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J-E. (1977). The internationalization process of the firm: a model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments. Journal of International Business Studies, 8(1), 23-32.

▪ Kaplinsky, R., & Morris, M. (2009). Chinese FDI in Sub-Saharan Africa: engaging with large dragons. The European Journal of Development Research, 21(4), 551-569.

▪ Khanna, T., & Palepu, K. (1997). Why focused strategies may be wrong for emerging markets. Harvard Business Review, 75(4), 41-48.

▪ Khanna, T., & Palepu, K. G. (2010). Winning in emerging markets: a road map for strategy and execution. Cambridge: Harvard Business Press.

▪ Kwok, C. C., & Tadesse, S. (2006). The MNC as an agent of change for host-country institutions: FDI and corruption. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(6), 767-785.

▪ Luo, Y., & Tung, R. L. (2007). International expansion of emerging market enterprises: a springboard perspective. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(4), 481-498.

▪ Narayanan, V. K., & Fahey, L. (2005). The relevance of the institutional underpinnings of Porter’s five forces framework to emerging economies: an epistemological analysis. Journal of Management Studies, 42(1), 207-223.

▪ North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

▪ Peng, M. W., Wang, D. Y. L., & Jiang, Y. (2008). An institution-based view of international business strategy: a focus on emerging economies. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(5), 920-936.

▪ Ramamurti, R. (2012). What is really different about emerging market multinationals. Global Strategy Journal, 2(1), 41-47.

▪ Ramasamy, B., Yeung, M., & Laforet, S. (2012). China's outward foreign direct investment: Location choice and firm ownership, Journal of World Business, 47(1), 17-25.

▪ Spink, P K (1999). Análise de documentos de domínio público. In MJ Spink (Ed.), Práticas discursivas e produção de sentidos no cotidiano: Aproximações teóricas e metodológicas (pp. 123- 151). São Paulo, SP: Cortez Editora.

▪ United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (2011). World Investment Report 2011: Non-equity Modes of International Production and Development. Retrieved from http://unctad.org/en/publicationslibrary/wir2011_en.pdf.

▪ United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (2013a). Global Investment Trends Monitor: The rise of BRICS FDI and Africa (Special Edition, Unedited version). Retrieved from http://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/webdiaeia2013d6_en.pdf.

▪ Vilas-Bôas, J. C. (2011). A Atuação das empresas brasileiras na África no Governo Lula. (Monografia).

Instituto de Relações Internacionais, Universidade de Brasília, DF.

▪ Whalley, J., & Weisbrod, A. (2012). The contribution of Chinese FDI to Africa's pre-crisis growth surge. Global Economy Journal, 12(4), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/1524-5861.1873.

▪ World Bank (2012). World Development Indicators Database. Retrieved from http://data.worldbank.org/country/brazil.

▪ Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: design and methods (Applied Social Research Methods Series, 5). London: Sage Publications.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18568/1980-4865.12133-47